Bolaji Ibrahim, Alabi-Isama Lillian
Family Services Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hull York Medical School (HYMS), Diana Princess of Wales Hospital, Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Scartho Road, Grimsby DN33 2BA, UK.
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2009;2009:718981. doi: 10.1155/2009/718981. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
We review the medical literature on the success, safety and economic value of central neuraxial blockade-assisted (CNB) external cephalic version from randomized controlled studies identified from 1951 to 2009. The result showed that more women had successful ECV with regional anaesthesia with corresponding reduction in caesarean section rate. They were 1.5 times more likely than women not receiving anaesthesia to have a successful ECV. The number to treat is six women needed to receive anaesthesia for 1 baby to be turned from breech to cephalic presentation. Feto-maternal morbidity was not increased in the CNB-aided group consisting of only transient bradycardia. Although the appropriate amount of force for safe version has not been quantified, there was no report of uterine rupture despite removal of these patients from "excessive force-pain biofeedback loop" induced through motor nerve blockade. We can attribute 30% of cost savings amounting to pound42,150.00 directly to CNB using the most up to date Health Resource Group Code (HRG4). The initial results are encouraging but until the benefits and safety of CNB-aided ECV are substantiated by large randomized, blinded controlled trials, this practice cannot be universally recommended.
我们回顾了1951年至2009年间从随机对照研究中获取的关于中枢神经轴索阻滞辅助(CNB)外倒转术的成功率、安全性和经济价值的医学文献。结果显示,更多女性在区域麻醉下外倒转术成功,剖宫产率相应降低。她们成功进行外倒转术的可能性是未接受麻醉女性的1.5倍。每使1名胎儿从臀位转为头位,需要6名女性接受麻醉治疗。在仅出现短暂心动过缓的CNB辅助组中,母婴发病率并未增加。尽管尚未对安全倒转术的适当力量进行量化,但尽管通过运动神经阻滞消除了这些患者“过度用力-疼痛生物反馈回路”,却没有子宫破裂的报告。使用最新的健康资源组代码(HRG4),我们可以将高达42,150.00英镑的成本节约的30%直接归因于CNB。初步结果令人鼓舞,但在大型随机、双盲对照试验证实CNB辅助外倒转术的益处和安全性之前,这种做法不能被普遍推荐。