• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠 Dukes C 期肿瘤中,顶端淋巴结转移独立预测预后不良。

Apical node metastasis independently predicts poor survival in Dukes C colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery Department of Pathology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2011 May;13(5):526-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02188.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02188.x
PMID:20070342
Abstract

AIM

The prognostic significance of apical node metastasis in node-positive colorectal cancer (CRC) is disregarded by the Fourth American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM classification system. The influence of apical node metastases on overall 5-year survival among patients with Dukes stage C CRC was examined.

METHOD

Patients who underwent operative resection for CRC between 1999 and 2003 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and ninety patients were included in the study, including 203 with Dukes C apical node-negative cancers, 39 with Dukes C apical node-positive cancers and 48 with Dukes D cancers. The respective prevalence of extramural vascular invasion was 35%vs 64%vs 56% (P = 0.0005), T4-stage 24%vs 38%vs 48% (P = 0.013), positive resection margin 16%vs 41%vs 23% (P = 0.001), more than three positive nodes harvested 28%vs 85%vs 52% (P < 0.0001) and poorer tumour differentiation grade 9%vs 21%vs 23% (P = 0.009). Multivariate analyses of all Dukes C cancer patients (n = 242) showed a positive apical node to be a highly significant independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 2.281, 95% confidence interval 1.421-3.662, P = 0.0006). Extramural vascular invasion and a positive resection margin were also independent predictors of poor survival. Patients with Dukes C apical node-positive cancers had a significantly poorer overall 5-year survival compared to patients with Dukes C apical node-negative cancers (P < 0.0001) but survival was not significantly different compared to patients with distant metastases at initial presentation (P = 0.504).

CONCLUSION

Apical node metastasis appears to be a strong independent, negative prognostic factor of poor survival in Dukes C CRC.

摘要

目的

第四版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)和国际抗癌联盟(UICC)TNM 分类系统忽略了阳性淋巴结结直肠癌(CRC)中尖部淋巴结转移的预后意义。本研究旨在研究尖部淋巴结转移对 Dukes C 期 CRC 患者总 5 年生存率的影响。

方法

回顾性分析 1999 年至 2003 年间接受 CRC 手术切除的患者。

结果

本研究共纳入 290 例患者,其中 203 例 Dukes C 期尖部淋巴结阴性癌症,39 例 Dukes C 期尖部淋巴结阳性癌症,48 例 Dukes D 期癌症。相应的外膜血管侵犯发生率分别为 35%vs 64%vs 56%(P = 0.0005),T4 期分别为 24%vs 38%vs 48%(P = 0.013),阳性切缘分别为 16%vs 41%vs 23%(P = 0.001),阳性淋巴结清扫分别为 28%vs 85%vs 52%(P < 0.0001),肿瘤分化程度较差分别为 9%vs 21%vs 23%(P = 0.009)。对所有 Dukes C 期癌症患者(n = 242)进行多因素分析,发现阳性尖部淋巴结是死亡率的一个非常显著的独立预测因素(风险比 2.281,95%置信区间 1.421-3.662,P = 0.0006)。外膜血管侵犯和阳性切缘也是不良生存的独立预测因素。与 Dukes C 期尖部淋巴结阴性癌症患者相比,Dukes C 期尖部淋巴结阳性癌症患者的总体 5 年生存率显著降低(P < 0.0001),但与初诊时远处转移的患者相比,生存率无显著差异(P = 0.504)。

结论

在 Dukes C 期 CRC 中,尖部淋巴结转移似乎是预后不良的一个独立的、强烈的负性预后因素。

相似文献

1
Apical node metastasis independently predicts poor survival in Dukes C colorectal cancer.结直肠 Dukes C 期肿瘤中,顶端淋巴结转移独立预测预后不良。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 May;13(5):526-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02188.x.
2
Intramural and extramural vascular invasion in colorectal cancer: prognostic significance and quality of pathology reporting.结直肠癌的壁内和壁外血管侵犯:预后意义和病理报告质量。
Cancer. 2012 Feb 1;118(3):628-38. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26310. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
3
Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined.结直肠肿瘤标本的淋巴结回收:关于建议检查的最少淋巴结数量
World J Surg. 2002 Mar;26(3):384-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0236-8. Epub 2002 Jan 15.
4
Metastatic lymph node size and colorectal cancer prognosis.转移性淋巴结大小与结直肠癌预后
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jan;200(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.037.
5
The prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in Dukes stage C colorectal cancer in a district general hospital.在地区综合医院中,Dukes 期 C 结直肠癌中转移性淋巴结比率的预后意义。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Dec;12(12):1219-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02026.x.
6
A novel data-driven prognostic model for staging of colorectal cancer.一种用于结直肠癌分期的新型数据驱动预后模型。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Nov;213(5):579-588, 588.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
7
For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis.对于患有杜克B期(TNM分期II期)结直肠癌的患者,检查六个或更少的淋巴结与预后不良有关。
Cancer. 1998 Aug 15;83(4):666-72.
8
Prognostic significance of apical lymph node metastasis in patients with node-positive rectal cancer.直肠淋巴结阳性患者的肿瘤顶转移的预后意义。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;15(1):e13-20. doi: 10.1111/codi.12055.
9
[Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].[UICC与JGCA胃癌淋巴结分期标准的预后价值比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 May;30(5):376-80.
10
Improvement of 10-year survival by Japanese radical lymph node dissection in patients with Dukes' B and C colorectal cancer: a 17-year retrospective study.日本根治性淋巴结清扫术对Dukes' B期和C期结直肠癌患者10年生存率的改善:一项17年的回顾性研究。
Oncol Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;10(4):927-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Metastatic Patterns of Apical Lymph Node and Prognostic Analysis in Rectal and Sigmoid Colon Cancer-A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of 2809 Cases.直肠癌和乙状结肠癌顶端淋巴结转移模式及预后分析——一项纳入2809例病例的多中心回顾性队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;17(14):2389. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142389.
2
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus Standard Resection for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术与标准切除术的长期肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 May 31;56(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01248-2.
3
Lymphatic spread patterns in young versus elderly patients with stage III colon cancer.
年轻和老年 III 期结肠癌患者的淋巴扩散模式。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae036.
4
The Clinical Impact of Apical Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer After Curative Resection.结直肠癌根治性切除术后的肿瘤顶端淋巴结转移的临床影响
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Jun;54(2):506-512. doi: 10.1007/s12029-022-00828-w. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
Prognosis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Apical Lymph Node Metastasis at the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肠系膜下动脉处结直肠癌伴顶端淋巴结转移患者的预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 17;8:800717. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.800717. eCollection 2021.
6
Metastasis to lymph nodes around the vascular tie worsens long-term oncological outcomes following complete mesocolic excision and conventional colectomy for right-sided colon cancer.血管结扎周围淋巴结转移会使右侧结肠癌行完整结肠系膜切除术和传统结肠切除术的长期肿瘤学结果恶化。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Mar;25(3):309-317. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02378-4. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
Prognostic Utility of Apical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Left-sided Colorectal Cancer.左半结直肠癌患者的肿瘤转移至顶端淋巴结的预后价值。
In Vivo. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):2981-2989. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12129.
8
Prognostic Value of EGFR Expression for Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer Receiving Fluoropyrimidine Metronomic Maintenance Therapy After Radical Resection and Adjuvant Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy.表皮生长因子受体表达对接受氟嘧啶节拍维持治疗的 III 期结直肠癌根治术后辅助奥沙利铂化疗患者的预后价值。
Oncol Res. 2021 Sep 7;28(7):701-714. doi: 10.3727/096504020X15986099915822. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
9
Apical Lymph Nodes in the Distant Metastases and Prognosis of Patients with Stage III Colorectal Cancer with Adequate Lymph Node Retrieval Following FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy.辅助化疗 FOLFOX 后,足够淋巴结取样的 III 期结直肠癌远处转移和预后的肿瘤转移率
Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jul;25(3):905-913. doi: 10.1007/s12253-017-0381-5. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
10
Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature.结肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术及扩大(D3)淋巴结清扫术:额外的努力值得吗?文献综述
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Apr;31(4):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2502-0. Epub 2016 Jan 30.