Suppr超能文献

种植体平台转换与边缘骨水平变化:一项随机对照临床试验的结果。

Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial.

机构信息

Private Practice, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):115-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01867.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This randomized-controlled trial aimed to evaluate marginal bone level alterations at implants restored according to the platform-switching concept, using different implant/abutment mismatching.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty implants were divided according to the platform diameter in four groups: 3.8 mm (control), 4.3 mm (test group(1)), 4.8 mm (test group(2)) and 5.5 mm (test group(3)), and randomly placed in the posterior maxilla of 31 patients. After 3 months, implants were connected to a 3.8-mm-diameter abutment and final restorations were performed. Radiographic bone height was measured by two independent examiners at the time of implant placement (baseline), and after 9, 15, 21 and 33 months.

RESULTS

After 21 months, all 80 implants were clinically osseointegrated in the 31 patients treated. A total of 69 implants were available for analysis, as 11 implants had to be excluded from the study due to early unintentional cover screw exposure. Radiographic evaluation showed a mean bone loss of 0.99 mm (SD = 0.42 mm) for test group(1), 0.82 mm (SD = 0.36 mm) for test group(2) and 0.56 mm (SD = 0.31 mm) for test group(3). These values were statistically significantly lower (P<0.005) compared with control (1.49 mm, SD = 0.54 mm). After 33 months, five patients were lost to follow-up. Evaluation of the remaining 60 implants showed no difference compared with 21 months data except for test group(2) (0.87 mm) and test group(3) (0.64 mm). There was an inverse correlation between the extent of mismatching and the amount of bone loss.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that marginal bone level alterations could be related to the extent of implant/abutment mismatching. Marginal bone levels were better maintained at implants restored according to the platform-switching concept.

摘要

目的

本随机对照试验旨在评估根据平台转换概念修复的种植体的边缘骨水平变化,使用不同的种植体/基台不匹配。

材料和方法

将 80 个种植体根据平台直径分为四组:3.8mm(对照组)、4.3mm(试验组 1)、4.8mm(试验组 2)和 5.5mm(试验组 3),并随机放置在 31 名患者的上颌后部。3 个月后,将种植体连接到 3.8mm 直径的基台上,并进行最终修复。在种植体放置时(基线)、9、15、21 和 33 个月时,由两名独立的检查者测量放射学骨高度。

结果

21 个月后,31 名接受治疗的患者中,所有 80 个种植体均临床骨整合。共有 69 个种植体可用于分析,因为有 11 个种植体因早期非故意覆盖螺丝暴露而不得不从研究中排除。放射学评估显示,试验组 1 的平均骨损失为 0.99mm(SD=0.42mm),试验组 2 为 0.82mm(SD=0.36mm),试验组 3 为 0.56mm(SD=0.31mm)。这些值与对照组(1.49mm,SD=0.54mm)相比具有统计学显著差异(P<0.005)。33 个月后,有 5 名患者失访。对其余 60 个种植体的评估与 21 个月的数据相比没有差异,除了试验组 2(0.87mm)和试验组 3(0.64mm)。种植体/基台不匹配程度与骨量损失之间存在反比关系。

结论

本研究表明,边缘骨水平变化可能与种植体/基台不匹配程度有关。根据平台转换概念修复的种植体边缘骨水平得到更好的维持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验