Psychiatric Unit, Virgen del Camino Hospital, Irunlarrea 4, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Schizophr Res. 2010 May;118(1-3):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
To examine the prevalence, psychometric validity and response to antipsychotic drugs of DSM-IV catatonia signs and criteria in patients with a first-episode psychotic disorder.
Two-hundred antipsychotic-naive patients with a DSM-IV nonaffective psychosis were assessed for catatonia signs and criteria using the Modified Rogers Scale, and the psychometric validity of the 12 DSM-IV catatonia signs and diagnostic criteria was examined. Treatment response of catatonia was assessed in 173 patients who completed one-month trial with haloperidol (n=23), risperidone (n=93) or olanzapine (n=57).
Sixty-two patients (31%) endorsed at least one catatonia sign and 24 (12%) met DSM-IV criteria for catatonia. DSM-IV catatonia signs showed an excellent convergent validity (r>0.8) with other rating scales, and DSM-IV criteria showed moderate to fair concordance with other criteria (kappa from 0.57 to 0.77). The total number of signs reflected catatonia severity and demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance against alternative diagnostic criteria. The presence of at least any three signs accurately identified patients with catatonia. Three catatonia domains were identified (hyperkinesia, volitional and hypokinesia), which showed a different association pattern with external variables. Overall, catatonia ratings were particularly related to both dyskinesia and disorganization symptoms and lacked diagnostic specificity for schizophrenia. Patients with catatonia responded well to antipsychotic medication irrespective of the type of antipsychotic drug used, although treatment response was dependent upon the remission of psychotic symptoms.
These results may inform the DSM-V development on diagnosis and classification of catatonia, and indicate that catatonia signs and syndromes are highly responsive to antipsychotic drugs.
研究首次发作的精神病性障碍患者中 DSM-IV 紧张症体征和标准的患病率、心理测量效度以及抗精神病药物的反应。
使用改良 Rogers 量表评估 200 例抗精神病药物初治的 DSM-IV 非情感性精神病患者的紧张症体征和标准,并检验 12 项 DSM-IV 紧张症体征和诊断标准的心理测量效度。在完成为期一个月的氟哌啶醇(n=23)、利培酮(n=93)或奥氮平(n=57)治疗试验的 173 例患者中评估紧张症的治疗反应。
62 例患者(31%)至少有 1 项紧张症体征,24 例患者(12%)符合 DSM-IV 紧张症标准。DSM-IV 紧张症体征与其他评定量表具有极好的一致性(r>0.8),而 DSM-IV 标准与其他标准具有中等至适度一致性(kappa 值为 0.57 至 0.77)。体征总数反映了紧张症的严重程度,并且对替代诊断标准具有极好的诊断性能。至少有 3 项体征存在可准确识别出紧张症患者。确定了 3 个紧张症域(运动亢进、意志运动和运动低下),它们与外部变量呈现出不同的关联模式。总体而言,紧张症评分与运动障碍和紊乱症状特别相关,并且对精神分裂症缺乏诊断特异性。无论使用何种类型的抗精神病药物,患有紧张症的患者对抗精神病药物的反应均良好,尽管治疗反应取决于精神病症状的缓解。
这些结果可能为 DSM-V 紧张症的诊断和分类提供信息,并表明紧张症体征和综合征对抗精神病药物高度敏感。