Lloyd Jenifer R, Silverman Eric R, Kugler Joseph L, Cooper Joseph J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas-Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Sep 25;16:2191-2208. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S231573. eCollection 2020.
Catatonia is a serious, common syndrome of motoric and behavioral dysfunction, which carries high morbidity and mortality. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the definitive treatment for catatonia, but access to ECT for the treatment of catatonia remains inappropriately limited. Catatonia is observable, detectable, and relevant to various medical specialties, but underdiagnosis impedes the delivery of appropriate treatment and heightens risk of serious complications including iatrogenesis. Current understanding of catatonia's pathophysiology links it to the current understanding of ECT's mechanism of action. Definitive catatonia care requires recognition of the syndrome, workup to identify and treat the underlying cause, and effective management including appropriate referral for ECT. Even when all of these conditions are met, and despite well-established data on the safety and efficacy of ECT, stigma surrounding ECT and legal restrictions for its use in catatonia are additional critical barriers. Addressing the underdiagnosis of catatonia and barriers to its treatment with ECT is vital to improving outcomes for patients. While no standardized protocols for treatment of catatonia with ECT exist, a large body of research guides evidence-based care and reveals where additional research is warranted. The authors conducted a review of the literature on ECT as a treatment for catatonia. Based on the review, the authors offer strategies and future directions for improving access to ECT for patients with catatonia, and propose an algorithm for the treatment of catatonia with ECT.
紧张症是一种严重且常见的运动和行为功能障碍综合征,其发病率和死亡率都很高。电休克疗法(ECT)是治疗紧张症的决定性方法,但用于治疗紧张症的ECT获取途径仍然受到不当限制。紧张症是可观察、可检测的,且与多个医学专科相关,但诊断不足会妨碍适当治疗的提供,并增加包括医源性疾病在内的严重并发症风险。目前对紧张症病理生理学的理解将其与当前对ECT作用机制的理解联系起来。明确的紧张症护理需要识别该综合征、进行检查以确定并治疗潜在病因,以及进行有效管理,包括适当转诊接受ECT治疗。即使满足了所有这些条件,尽管ECT的安全性和有效性已有充分数据,但围绕ECT的污名以及其在紧张症治疗中的法律限制仍是额外的关键障碍。解决紧张症诊断不足以及ECT治疗障碍对于改善患者预后至关重要。虽然不存在用于ECT治疗紧张症的标准化方案,但大量研究为循证护理提供了指导,并揭示了哪些方面还需要更多研究。作者对关于ECT治疗紧张症的文献进行了综述。基于该综述,作者提供了改善紧张症患者获取ECT治疗的策略和未来方向,并提出了ECT治疗紧张症的算法。