• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的脊柱分类系统的评估,它能否准确预测治疗效果?

Evaluation of a new spine classification system, does it accurately predict treatment?

作者信息

Lenarz Christopher J, Place Howard M

机构信息

Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 May;23(3):192-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819e30c1.

DOI:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819e30c1
PMID:20072035
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

The Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS) was introduced as a novel classifications system. Its aim was to simplify classification of thoracolumbar fractures, grade their severity in an ordinal manner as a guide to management. This study attempted to validate the TLISS as a guide to management.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the TLISS as a tool for guiding management of thoracolumbar fractures using the outcomes of 97 previously treated spinal fracture.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The TLISS was proposed as a tool for guidance of the management of thoracolumbar fractures to aid the surgeon in choosing management.

METHOD

Ninety-seven sequential traumatic thoracolumbar fractures were retrospectively reviewed for their management and outcomes. The presenting clinical information had all personal identifiers removed and the fractures were reevaluated by the treating physician using the TLISS. Eighty-one patients had received management that agreed with the suggested management of the TLISS. Nine patients had a score of 4. Seven patients received management that disagreed with the TLISS. Variables affecting the management that differed from the management suggested by the TLISS were identified in each patient and assessed.

RESULT

Of the 97 patients identified, 81 had received management that agreed with the suggested management of the TLISS. Of the 16 remaining patients, 3 patients scored a 3 or less and received an operation, 1 of which, failed conservative management. Four scored a 5 or more and were managed conservatively, none with known failure. Nine patients scored the ambiguous score of 4. Of these, 4 were managed operatively and 5 nonoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

As a management tool, the TLISS seems to consistently suggest treatment consistent with past treatment recommendations. Multilevel contiguous fractures and extension injuries in the ankylosed thoracic spine appear to be the most consistent exceptions to the TLISS guidelines.

摘要

研究设计

胸腰段损伤严重程度评分(TLISS)作为一种新的分类系统被引入。其目的是简化胸腰段骨折的分类,以序数方式对其严重程度进行分级,作为治疗的指导。本研究试图验证TLISS作为治疗指导的有效性。

目的

利用97例既往治疗的脊柱骨折的结果,评估TLISS作为指导胸腰段骨折治疗的工具。

背景数据总结

TLISS被提议作为指导胸腰段骨折治疗的工具,以帮助外科医生选择治疗方法。

方法

回顾性分析97例连续性创伤性胸腰段骨折的治疗及结果。所呈现的临床信息去除了所有个人标识符,治疗医生使用TLISS对骨折进行重新评估。81例患者接受的治疗与TLISS建议的治疗一致。9例患者评分为4分。7例患者接受的治疗与TLISS不一致。确定并评估了每位患者中影响与TLISS建议不同的治疗的变量。

结果

在确定的97例患者中,81例接受的治疗与TLISS建议的治疗一致。在其余16例患者中,3例评分为3分或更低并接受了手术,其中1例保守治疗失败。4例评分为5分或更高并接受了保守治疗,无一例已知失败。9例患者评分为不明确的4分。其中,4例接受了手术治疗,5例接受了非手术治疗。

结论

作为一种治疗工具,TLISS似乎始终如一地建议与过去的治疗建议一致的治疗方法。多节段连续骨折和强直性胸椎的伸展损伤似乎是TLISS指南最一致的例外情况。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a new spine classification system, does it accurately predict treatment?一种新的脊柱分类系统的评估,它能否准确预测治疗效果?
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 May;23(3):192-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819e30c1.
2
The influence of fracture mechanism and morphology on the reliability and validity of two novel thoracolumbar injury classification systems.骨折机制和形态对两种新型胸腰椎损伤分类系统的可靠性和有效性的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):791-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000258882.96011.47.
3
Comparative reliability of 3 thoracolumbar fracture classification systems.三种胸腰椎骨折分类系统的比较可靠性
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Aug;22(6):422-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31818a38cd.
4
The adoption of a new classification system: time-dependent variation in interobserver reliability of the thoracolumbar injury severity score classification system.一种新分类系统的采用:胸腰椎损伤严重程度评分分类系统观察者间可靠性的时间依赖性变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E105-10. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254107.57551.8a.
5
Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score.一种新型胸腰椎损伤分类系统的可靠性:胸腰椎损伤严重程度评分
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 15;31(11 Suppl):S62-9; discussion S104. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000218072.25964.a9.
6
Retrospective evaluation of the validity of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System in 458 consecutively treated patients.回顾性评估 458 例连续治疗患者的胸腰椎损伤分类系统的有效性。
Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1760-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
7
Is the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) Superior to the AO Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System for Guiding the Surgical Management of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures without Neurological Deficit?对于无神经功能缺损的不稳定胸腰椎爆裂骨折的手术治疗指导,胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)是否优于AO胸腰椎损伤分类系统?
Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(1):94-98. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.19094-16.2.
8
Conservative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a long-term follow-up results with special reference to the load sharing classification.胸腰椎爆裂骨折的保守治疗:特别参照载荷分担分类的长期随访结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 1;33(23):2536-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181851bc2.
9
The evolution of thoracolumbar injury classification systems.胸腰椎损伤分类系统的演变
Spine J. 2009 Sep;9(9):780-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 May 30.
10
Agreement between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons regarding a new algorithm for the treatment of thoracolumbar injuries: a multicenter reliability study.骨科医生与神经外科医生关于一种治疗胸腰椎损伤的新算法的共识:一项多中心可靠性研究。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Oct;19(7):477-82. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211237.14211.21.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI Inter-Reader and Intra-Reader Reliabilities for Assessing Injury Morphology and Posterior Ligamentous Complex Integrity of the Spine According to the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Severity Score.根据胸腰椎损伤分类系统和严重程度评分,评估脊柱损伤形态和后韧带复合体完整性的MRI阅片者间及阅片者内可靠性
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(4):889-98. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.4.889. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
2
Management of distraction injury of the lumbosacral junction with unilateral perched facet.单侧关节突关节脱位型腰骶部交界区牵张损伤的治疗
Surg Neurol Int. 2011 Mar 3;2:26. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.77278.