Suppr超能文献

达芬奇机器人系统的人机工程学评估和使用指南。

Ergonomic evaluation and guidelines for use of the daVinci Robot system.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2010 Mar;24(3):371-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0197.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The daVinci Robot system has been widely lauded for its improved ergonomic characteristics when compared with the pure laparoscopic technique. Our goal in this study was to assess for the existence of guidelines to maximize the ergonomic benefits of the daVinci system. We also compared the surgeon's console with the recommendations of similar workstations.

METHODS

A literature review of seated ergonomics was performed to identify recommendations for work areas similar to the robotic system, where prolong seating is necessary. An upper body biomechanics and ergonomic expert was consulted to evaluate the daVinci system and aid in the formation of ergonomic positioning guidelines. Link-length proportions were used to evaluate size constraints of potential robot operators.

RESULTS

No published guidelines exist for proper positioning using the daVinci surgeon console. There are, however, several Occupational Safety and Health Administration workstation guidelines as well as microscope ergonomic guidelines. The use of link-length proportions showed that the surgeon console allows a comfortable posture for individuals with height between 64 and 73 inches. Review of the microscope ergonomics literature indicates that a neutral vertical seating position has been associated with decreased strain and musculoskeletal disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The body mechanics of the daVinci robot system best mimics that of microscopy. Future surgeon console modifications could emulate those reported in the microscope ergonomic literature, where a neutral vertical position has been recommended. This may help avoid potential musculoskeletal disorders similar to those previously seen with microscopy usage. Guidelines are suggested to optimize the surgeon's console position.

摘要

简介

与纯腹腔镜技术相比,达芬奇机器人系统具有更好的人体工程学特性,因此受到广泛赞誉。我们在这项研究中的目标是评估是否存在最大限度发挥达芬奇系统人体工程学优势的指南。我们还将手术控制台与类似工作站的建议进行了比较。

方法

对坐姿人体工程学进行了文献回顾,以确定与机器人系统类似的工作区域的建议,在这些区域中需要长时间坐着。咨询了一位上半身生物力学和人体工程学专家,以评估达芬奇系统并协助制定人体工程学定位指南。使用连杆长度比例来评估潜在机器人操作人员的尺寸限制。

结果

目前没有关于使用达芬奇手术控制台正确定位的指南。但是,有一些职业安全与健康管理局工作站指南以及显微镜人体工程学指南。连杆长度比例的使用表明,手术控制台允许身高在 64 到 73 英寸之间的人保持舒适的姿势。对显微镜人体工程学文献的回顾表明,中立的垂直坐姿与减少压力和肌肉骨骼疾病有关。

结论

达芬奇机器人系统的人体力学最类似于显微镜。未来手术控制台的修改可以模仿显微镜人体工程学文献中报道的那些,其中推荐了中立的垂直位置。这有助于避免类似显微镜使用中出现的潜在肌肉骨骼疾病。建议制定指南以优化手术控制台的位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验