Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 14;10:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-14.
Integrative health care (IHC) is an interdisciplinary blending of conventional medicine and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) with the purpose of enhancing patients' health. In 2006, we designed a study to assess outcomes that are relevant to people using such care. However, we faced major challenges in conducting this study and hypothesized that this might be due to the lack of a research climate in these clinics. To investigate these challenges, we initiated a further study in 2008, to explore the reasons why IHC clinics are not conducting outcomes research and to identify strategies for conducting successful in-house outcomes research programs. The results of the latter study are reported here.
A total of 25 qualitative interviews were conducted with key participants from 19 IHC clinics across Canada. Basic content analysis was used to identify key themes from the transcribed interviews.
Barriers identified by participants fell into four categories: organizational culture, organizational resources, organizational environment and logistical challenges. Cultural challenges relate to the philosophy of IHC, organizational leadership and practitioner attitudes and beliefs. Participants also identified significant issues relating to their organization's lack of resources such as funding, compensation, infrastructure and partnerships/linkages. Environmental challenges such as the nature of a clinic's patient population and logistical issues such as the actual implementation of a research program and the applicability of research data also posed challenges to the conduct of research. Embedded research leadership, integration of personal and professional values about research, alignment of research activities and clinical workflow processes are some of the factors identified by participants that support IHC clinics' ability to conduct outcomes research.
Assessing and enhancing the broader evaluation culture of IHC clinics prior to implementing outcomes research may be a critical step towards ensuring productive and cost-effective research programs. However, as IHC clinics are often complex systems, a whole systems approach to research should be used taking into account the multidimensional and complex nature of such treatment systems so that the results are useful and reflect real life.
综合医疗保健(IHC)是一种将传统医学和补充与替代医学(CAM)相结合的跨学科方法,旨在增强患者的健康。2006 年,我们设计了一项研究来评估与使用此类护理的人相关的结果。然而,我们在进行这项研究时面临重大挑战,并假设这可能是由于这些诊所缺乏研究氛围。为了调查这些挑战,我们于 2008 年启动了进一步的研究,以探讨 IHC 诊所不进行结果研究的原因,并确定开展成功内部结果研究计划的策略。本报告介绍了后者研究的结果。
对来自加拿大 19 家 IHC 诊所的 25 名关键参与者进行了总计 25 次定性访谈。使用基本内容分析从转录访谈中确定关键主题。
参与者确定的障碍分为四类:组织文化、组织资源、组织环境和后勤挑战。文化挑战与 IHC 的哲学、组织领导力以及从业者的态度和信念有关。参与者还确定了与组织资源不足相关的重大问题,例如资金、薪酬、基础设施和伙伴关系/联系。环境挑战,如诊所患者群体的性质以及研究计划的实际实施和研究数据的适用性等后勤问题,也对研究的开展构成了挑战。嵌入的研究领导力、对研究的个人和专业价值观的整合、研究活动和临床工作流程的调整是参与者确定的一些支持 IHC 诊所进行结果研究的因素。
在实施结果研究之前,评估和加强 IHC 诊所的更广泛评估文化可能是确保富有成效和具有成本效益的研究计划的关键步骤。然而,由于 IHC 诊所通常是复杂的系统,因此应该采用整体系统方法进行研究,同时考虑到此类治疗系统的多维和复杂性质,以便结果有用并反映现实生活。