Department of Business Economics and Public Policy, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2010 Mar;100(3):489-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160804. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
We used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to compare health insurance coverage, access to care, and women's cancer screenings for individuals in same-sex versus different-sex relationships.
We estimated logistic regression models by using data on 5265 individuals in same-sex relationships and 802,659 individuals in different-sex relationships.
Compared with women in different-sex relationships, women in same-sex relationships were significantly less likely to have health insurance coverage, were less likely to have had a checkup within the past year, were more likely to report unmet medical needs, and were less likely to have had a recent mammogram or Pap test. Compared with men in different-sex relationships, men in same-sex relationships were significantly less likely to have health insurance coverage and were more likely to report unmet medical needs, although they were more likely to have had a checkup in the past year.
In the largest and most recent nationally representative sample, we found important differences in health insurance coverage and access to care between individuals in same-sex relationships and those in different-sex relationships for both men and women.
我们利用来自行为风险因素监测系统的数据,比较了同性关系和异性关系个体的医疗保险覆盖范围、获得医疗服务的机会以及女性的癌症筛查情况。
我们通过对 5265 名处于同性关系的个体和 802659 名处于异性关系的个体的数据进行了逻辑回归模型的估计。
与处于异性关系的女性相比,处于同性关系的女性的医疗保险覆盖率明显较低,在过去一年中接受体检的可能性较小,报告未满足的医疗需求的可能性较大,并且最近进行过乳房 X 光检查或巴氏涂片检查的可能性较小。与处于异性关系的男性相比,处于同性关系的男性的医疗保险覆盖率明显较低,并且更有可能报告未满足的医疗需求,但他们在过去一年中接受体检的可能性较大。
在规模最大且最新的全国代表性样本中,我们发现同性关系和异性关系个体在医疗保险覆盖范围和获得医疗服务方面存在显著差异,无论男女均如此。