Lupez Emily Lupton, Woolhandler Steffie, Himmelstein David U, Dickman Samuel, Schrier Elizabeth, Azaroff Lenore S, Cai Chris, McCormick Danny
Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan 2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09258-9.
Millions of Americans have medical debt and/or defer care due to cost. Few studies have examined the association of such health-related financial problems with sexual orientation or gender identity, and whether state-level policies protecting sexual and gender minority (SGM) people affect disparities in such problems.
To examine the relationships between SGM status, state-level SGM protections, and health-related financial problems.
Cross-sectional analysis.
Nationally-representative sample of U.S. adults in the 2021 National Financial Capability Study.
Prevalence of medical debt and/or deferred care; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) by SGM status and residence in a state with fewer SGM protections.
Of 25,170 survey respondents, 3.7% were gay/bisexual men, 4.3% lesbian/bisexual women, and 0.6% transgender people. Among lesbian/bisexual women, 39.4% had medical debt, the highest proportion of any group. Accounting for sociodemographic and personal-financial factors, women and all lesbian/gay/bisexual persons (vs. straight men) more often experienced medical debt (aOR [95% CI]: straight women 1.28 [1.16, 1.41], gay/bisexual men 1.55 [1.23, 1.94], lesbian/bisexual women 1.80 [1.50, 2.10]) or deferred care (e.g., 1.80 [1.51, 2.16] for lesbian/bisexual women). Transgender people vs. cisgender men were more likely to defer care (aOR = 2.58 [1.54, 4.30]). Living in a state with fewer SGM protections was associated with higher rates of health-related financial problems for most groups, especially cisgender women and lesbian/bisexual women.
Lesbian/gay/bisexual, female, and transgender adults experience more health-related financial problems, especially in states lacking SGM protections, underlining the importance of universal, comprehensive insurance coverage (including for services unique to SGM people), ending bans on gender-affirming care, and closing the male-female pay gap.
数以百万计的美国人背负医疗债务和/或因费用问题而推迟就医。很少有研究探讨此类与健康相关的财务问题与性取向或性别认同之间的关联,以及保护性少数群体(SGM)的州级政策是否会影响这些问题上的差异。
研究SGM身份、州级SGM保护措施与健康相关财务问题之间的关系。
横断面分析。
2021年全国金融能力研究中具有全国代表性的美国成年人样本。
医疗债务和/或推迟就医的患病率;按SGM身份以及是否居住在SGM保护措施较少的州调整后的比值比(aOR)。
在25170名调查受访者中,3.7%为男同性恋/双性恋者,4.3%为女同性恋/双性恋者,0.6%为跨性别者。在女同性恋/双性恋女性中,39.4%有医疗债务,是所有群体中比例最高的。在考虑社会人口统计学和个人财务因素后,女性以及所有女同性恋/男同性恋/双性恋者(与异性恋男性相比)更常面临医疗债务(aOR[95%CI]:异性恋女性1.28[1.16,1.41],男同性恋/双性恋男性1.55[1.23,1.94],女同性恋/双性恋女性1.80[1.50,2.10])或推迟就医(例如,女同性恋/双性恋女性为1.80[1.51,2.16])。跨性别者与顺性别男性相比更有可能推迟就医(aOR = 2.58[1.54,4.30])。对于大多数群体,尤其是顺性别女性和女同性恋/双性恋女性,生活在SGM保护措施较少的州与更高的健康相关财务问题发生率相关。
女同性恋/男同性恋/双性恋、女性和跨性别成年人面临更多与健康相关的财务问题,尤其是在缺乏SGM保护措施的州,这凸显了普及全面保险覆盖(包括针对SGM人群的独特服务)、结束对性别肯定治疗的禁令以及消除男女薪酬差距的重要性。