• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再次探讨视标呈现时间对视力估计的影响。

The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited.

机构信息

Sektion Funktionelle Sehforschung, Univ.-Augenklinik, Killianstr. 5, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):389-94. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1268-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-009-1268-2
PMID:20076965
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A high reproducibility of visual acuity estimates is important when monitoring disease progression or treatment success. One factor that may affect the result of an acuity measurement is the duration of optotype presentation. For times below 1 s, previous studies have convincingly shown that acuity estimates increase with presentation duration. For durations above 1 s, the situation is less clear.

METHODS

We have reassessed this issue using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test with normal subjects. Presentation durations of 0.1 s, 1 s, and 10 s were assessed.

RESULTS

Confirming previous findings, in all subjects acuity estimates in the 1-s condition were higher than those in the 0.1-s condition, on average nearly by a factor of 2, equivalent to 3 lines. However, in 12 out of 14 subjects, acuity estimates increased further with a presentation duration of 10 s, on average by 23% (P=0.002), or roughly 1 line. Test-retest variability improved by 49% (P=0.003). These findings can be explained by a simple statistical model of acuity fluctuations. Cognitive processing may also be a relevant factor. Interestingly, most observers subjectively felt that they could perceive the optotypes best in the 1-s condition.

CONCLUSION

The results highlight the importance of standardizing presentation durations when high reproducibility is required.

摘要

背景

当监测疾病进展或治疗效果时,视力估计的高重复性非常重要。可能影响视力测量结果的一个因素是视标呈现的持续时间。对于 1 秒以下的时间,以前的研究已经令人信服地表明,视力估计值随着呈现时间的延长而增加。对于 1 秒以上的持续时间,情况就不那么清楚了。

方法

我们使用弗莱堡视觉 acuity 测试(Freiburg Visual Acuity Test)重新评估了这个问题,研究对象为正常受试者。评估了 0.1 秒、1 秒和 10 秒的呈现持续时间。

结果

与之前的发现一致,在所有受试者中,1 秒条件下的视力估计值均高于 0.1 秒条件下的,平均接近 2 倍,相当于 3 行。然而,在 14 名受试者中有 12 名,10 秒呈现持续时间的视力估计值进一步增加,平均增加 23%(P=0.002),或大致增加 1 行。测试-重测的可变性提高了 49%(P=0.003)。这些发现可以用视力波动的简单统计模型来解释。认知处理也可能是一个相关因素。有趣的是,大多数观察者主观上感觉他们在 1 秒的条件下可以最好地感知视标。

结论

这些结果强调了在需要高重复性时标准化呈现持续时间的重要性。

相似文献

1
The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited.再次探讨视标呈现时间对视力估计的影响。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):389-94. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1268-2.
2
The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis.弗莱堡视力测试——事后重新分析未改变变异性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;245(7):965-71. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0474-4. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
3
Similar Dependence of Acuity Measures on Exposure Duration Irrespective of Acuity Level in Artificially Degraded Vision.人工降低视力条件下,敏锐度测量值对曝光时间的依赖性与敏锐度水平无关。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Apr;46(4):595-598. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1809003. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
4
Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.使用儿科测试字母、图片和符号测量成人的拥挤现象和视力。
Vision Res. 2016 Apr;121:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
5
Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.新型高通过率字母视力表评分和终止规则对复测变异性的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Mar 6;55(3):1386-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13340.
6
Vanishing Optotype acuity: repeatability and effect of the number of alternatives.视标消失视力:可重复性和替代选项数量的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Jan;31(1):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00806.x.
7
A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.正常人类中对比敏感度与扫描视觉诱发电位(sVEP)视力估计值的比较。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;139(3):207-219. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09712-8. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
8
Resolving power to narrow and extended light sources and its influence on legibility of the optotypes.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994 Apr;14(2):150-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00103.x.
9
Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.用于测量年龄相关性黄斑变性最佳视力的计算机化测试。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;48(10):4838-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1240.
10
Visual acuity for optotypes made visible by relative motion.通过相对运动使视标可见时的视力。
Optom Vis Sci. 1990 Jan;67(1):49-55. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199001000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related normal limits for spatial vision.年龄相关性空间视觉的正常范围。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Nov;42(6):1363-1378. doi: 10.1111/opo.13037. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
2
Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.使用视觉诱发电位评估人类视力:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;20(19):5542. doi: 10.3390/s20195542.
3
The "speed" of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision.暗视与明视视力敏锐度的“速度”。

本文引用的文献

1
[The influence of the performance time on the recognizability of visual samples].[表演时间对视觉样本可识别性的影响]
Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1947 Aug 15;249(4):354-60.
2
On visual velocity.
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1948;26(2):115-21.
3
The Monte Carlo method.蒙特卡罗方法。
J Am Stat Assoc. 1949 Sep;44(247):335-41. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;258(12):2791-2798. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04867-6. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
4
VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.视诱发电位法估计视力:系统评价。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;142(1):25-74. doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09770-3. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.正常人类中对比敏感度与扫描视觉诱发电位(sVEP)视力估计值的比较。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;139(3):207-219. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09712-8. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Can VEP-based acuity estimates in one eye be improved by applying knowledge from the other eye?通过应用另一只眼睛的信息,能否提高基于视觉诱发电位(VEP)的单眼视力估计值?
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;139(2):161-168. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09700-y. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
P300-based acuity estimation in imitated amblyopia.基于P300的模拟弱视视力估计
Doc Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;136(1):69-74. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9617-7. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.低视力中基于视觉诱发电位的视力评估。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;135(3):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9613-y. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
9
[Improvement of vision through perceptual learning in the case of refractive errors and presbyopia : A critical valuation].[屈光不正和老花眼情况下通过知觉学习改善视力:一项批判性评估]
Ophthalmologe. 2017 Feb;114(2):173-176. doi: 10.1007/s00347-016-0433-3.
10
Individual Differences in Scotopic Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity: Genetic and Non-Genetic Influences.暗视觉视力和对比敏感度的个体差异:遗传和非遗传影响
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148192. eCollection 2016.
4
Role of the tear film in the optical quality of the human eye.泪膜在人眼光学质量中的作用。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.019.
5
[New tests of visual acuity, with special reference to flash duration in flash tests].[视力的新测试,特别涉及闪光测试中的闪光持续时间]
Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1951;151(7-8):714-24.
6
[Comparative study of tests used in the determination of distance vision].
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild. 1950;117(6):561-70.
7
Pupil unrest: an example of noise in a biological servomechanism.瞳孔不稳定:生物伺服机制中噪声的一个例子。
Nature. 1958 Sep 27;182(4639):857-8. doi: 10.1038/182857a0.
8
[Visual acuity as a function of the time of exposure].
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1957;114:574-81.
9
Time course of masking in spatial resolution tasks.
Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Feb;79(2):98-102. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200202000-00011.
10
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.方法比较研究中的一致性测量
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.