• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

述情障碍、累积反馈和在 Iowa 赌博任务中的差异反应模式。

Alexithymia, cumulative feedback, and differential response patterns on the Iowa Gambling Task.

机构信息

University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.

出版信息

J Pers. 2009 Jun;77(3):883-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00568.x. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00568.x
PMID:20078741
Abstract

Although the role of emotional processing is central to contemporary models of risky decision making, to date the role of trait emotional understanding has not been explored experimentally in this context. The current experiment (N=326) explores the role of alexithymia with respect to performance on the standard Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and a version where cumulative financial feedback is obscured. Standard learning on the IGT was observed for those low in alexithymia. Those high in alexithymia learned to avoid disadvantageous decks over the first half of the task. However, over the later trials they showed a change in performance, shifting from advantageous to disadvantageous and back to advantageous decks again (termed an "explore-learn-change-return" strategy). It is argued that this is due to an inability to fully consolidate earlier learning and reduced sensitivity to losses. The absence of cumulative feedback independently resulted in reduced performance.

摘要

尽管情绪处理在当代风险决策模型中起着核心作用,但迄今为止,特质情绪理解在这方面的作用尚未在实验中得到探索。本实验(N=326)探讨了述情障碍在标准爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)和一个累积财务反馈被隐藏的版本上的表现中的作用。对于那些述情障碍程度较低的人来说,他们在 IGT 上的标准学习表现是可以观察到的。那些述情障碍程度较高的人在任务的前半段学会了避免不利的牌组。然而,在后来的试验中,他们的表现发生了变化,从有利的牌组转向不利的牌组,然后又回到有利的牌组(称为“探索-学习-改变-返回”策略)。这是因为他们无法完全整合早期的学习,并且对损失的敏感性降低。而没有累积反馈则会导致表现下降。

相似文献

1
Alexithymia, cumulative feedback, and differential response patterns on the Iowa Gambling Task.述情障碍、累积反馈和在 Iowa 赌博任务中的差异反应模式。
J Pers. 2009 Jun;77(3):883-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00568.x. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
2
Neural substrates of decision making as measured with the Iowa Gambling Task in men with alexithymia.用艾奥瓦赌博任务测量的述情障碍男性的决策神经基础。
Psychosom Med. 2011 Sep;73(7):588-97. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318223c7f8. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
3
Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.基于爱荷华赌博任务表现的情感决策的年龄差异。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Jan;46(1):193-207. doi: 10.1037/a0016128.
4
Emotion-based learning on a simplified card game: the Iowa and Bangor Gambling Tasks.基于情感的简易纸牌游戏学习:爱荷华和班戈赌博任务
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.009.
5
Effects of decision-phase time constraints on emotion-based learning in the Iowa Gambling Task.决策阶段时间限制对爱荷华赌博任务中基于情绪的学习的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2007 Jul;64(2):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
6
Implicit emotional biases in decision making: the case of the Iowa Gambling Task.决策中的内隐情绪偏差:以爱荷华赌博任务为例。
Brain Cogn. 2008 Apr;66(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
7
Anxiety impairs decision-making: psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task.焦虑会损害决策能力:来自爱荷华赌博任务的心理生理学证据。
Biol Psychol. 2008 Mar;77(3):353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.010. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
8
Decision making in Parkinson's disease: Analysis of behavioral and physiological patterns in the Iowa gambling task.帕金森病中的决策制定:爱荷华赌博任务中行为和生理模式的分析。
Mov Disord. 2008 Mar 15;23(4):547-52. doi: 10.1002/mds.21865.
9
Emotion-based learning and central executive resources: an investigation of intuition and the Iowa Gambling Task.基于情感的学习与中央执行资源:对直觉和爱荷华赌博任务的一项调查。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Apr;57(3):244-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.053.
10
Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?个体在爱荷华赌博任务中的表现差异是否能预测对风险收益和损失的适应性决策?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Feb;32(2):141-50. doi: 10.1080/13803390902881926. Epub 2009 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Gambling Severity Among Female Gamblers: Cross-Country Study with Spanish and Italian Clinical Population.女性赌徒赌博严重程度的预测因素:针对西班牙和意大利临床人群的跨国研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10369-5.
2
The process of emotion identification: Considerations for psychiatric disorders.情绪识别过程:精神障碍相关考虑因素。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Apr;148:264-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.01.053. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review.
非典型内感受作为精神病理学的一个共同风险因素:综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:470-508. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.036. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis.选择的痛苦?早期多发性硬化症中保留的情感决策能力
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 2;11:914. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00914. eCollection 2020.
5
Aberrant reward prediction error during Pavlovian appetitive learning in alexithymia.在述情障碍的条件性味觉学习中,异常的奖赏预测错误。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):1119-1129. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz089.
6
Alexithymia and the Reduced Ability to Represent the Value of Aversively Motivated Actions.述情障碍与厌恶动机行为价值表征能力的降低
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02587. eCollection 2018.
7
Language and alexithymia: Evidence for the role of the inferior frontal gyrus in acquired alexithymia.语言和述情障碍:下额叶在后天述情障碍中的作用证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:229-240. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Alexithymia predicts loss chasing for people at risk for problem gambling.述情障碍预示着有赌博问题风险的人会追逐损失。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec 1;6(4):630-638. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.076. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
9
On the Processes Underlying the Relationship Between Alexithymia and Gambling Severity.浅析述情障碍与赌博严重程度之间关系的潜在过程。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1049-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9715-1.
10
Associations between sheep farmer attitudes, beliefs, emotions and personality, and their barriers to uptake of best practice: The example of footrot.绵羊养殖户的态度、信念、情感和个性与其采用最佳实践的障碍之间的关联:以腐蹄病为例。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Apr 1;139(Pt B):123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 19.