Section of Population Health, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Medical School, Polwarth Building, Aberdeen, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 15;10:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-17.
There is considerable expertise in the obesity field in identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence to develop guidelines and recommendations for policy and practice. The recommendations, while based on evidence, are not formulated in a way that readily leads to implementation. This paper analyses the recent UK recommendations on obesity using a proposed implementation framework.
Two bibliographic databases (Medline and Embase) and various health related and government websites were systematically searched for obesity recommendations published between 1996 and 2007. All the documents published on recommendations for either prevention or treatment of obesity in the UK were assessed. A proposed implementation framework was developed for the purpose of this review. All the UK recommendations were critically appraised and results summarised according to the criteria used within the framework. Cross-country applicability of the proposed framework was assessed using the Swedish policy recommendations on obesity.
Most recommendations on obesity while demonstrating their basis in evidence, fail to meet the implementation standards. They tend to be non-specific in identifying who is responsible for implementation and monitoring, and often no timescale is indicated. The costs of implementation are rarely estimated and those responsible for such funding are not specified. There are some notable exemptions to the general pattern emanating from more operational and locally based groups. The Swedish policy details 79 proposals with responsibility clearly identified and costs are presented for 20 of them. This policy satisfied most of the framework criteria but failed to give details on evaluation, monitoring and the timeframe for implementation.
Public health has developed skills in appraising evidence and formulating recommendations based on appropriate evidence but these are often not implemented. Different skills are required to translate these recommendations into actions. Public health clearly needs to develop the implementation skills to a level comparable to the ability to synthesise evidence.
在肥胖领域,有相当多的专业知识可用于识别、评估和综合证据,以制定政策和实践的指南和建议。这些建议虽然基于证据,但制定方式却不容易付诸实施。本文使用一个提出的实施框架来分析最近英国关于肥胖的建议。
系统地检索了两个文献数据库(Medline 和 Embase)和各种与健康相关的政府网站,以寻找 1996 年至 2007 年间发表的肥胖建议。评估了所有在英国发表的关于肥胖预防或治疗建议的文件。为了本次审查的目的,提出了一个实施框架。根据框架中使用的标准,对所有英国建议进行了批判性评估,并对结果进行了总结。使用瑞典肥胖政策建议评估了所提出框架的跨国适用性。
大多数肥胖建议虽然表明了其证据基础,但不符合实施标准。它们往往没有具体说明谁负责实施和监测,并且通常没有指示时间范围。实施成本很少估计,也没有指定负责这些成本的人员。来自更具操作性和基于地方的团体的建议有一些明显的例外。瑞典政策详细说明了 79 项提案,明确了责任,其中 20 项提案提出了成本。这项政策满足了框架标准的大部分要求,但未能详细说明评估、监测和实施的时间框架。
公共卫生已经发展出评估证据和根据适当证据制定建议的技能,但这些建议往往没有得到实施。将这些建议转化为行动需要不同的技能。公共卫生显然需要将实施技能提高到与综合证据能力相当的水平。