Department of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ostrowskiego Street 30b, PL53238, Wroclaw, Poland.
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achter Street 30, D28359, Bremen, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 26;22(1):1055. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13340-4.
This meta-review investigated the context-related implementation determinants from seven domains (geographical, epidemiological, sociocultural, economic, ethics-related, political, and legal) that were systematically indicated as occurring during the implementation of obesity prevention policies targeting a healthy diet and a physically active lifestyle.
Data from nine databases and documentation of nine major stakeholders were searched for the purpose of this preregistered meta-review (#CRD42019133341). Context-related determinants were considered strongly supported if they were indicated in ≥60% of the reviews/stakeholder documents. The ROBIS tool and the Methodological Quality Checklist-SP were used to assess the quality-related risk of bias.
Published reviews (k = 25) and stakeholder documents that reviewed the evidence of policy implementation (k = 17) were included. Across documents, the following six determinants from three context domains received strong support: economic resources at the macro (66.7% of analyzed documents) and meso/micro levels (71.4%); sociocultural context determinants at the meso/micro level, references to knowledge/beliefs/abilities of target groups (69.0%) and implementers (73.8%); political context determinants (interrelated policies supported in 71.4% of analyzed reviews/documents; policies within organizations, 69.0%).
These findings indicate that sociocultural, economic, and political contexts need to be accounted for when formulating plans for the implementation of a healthy diet and physical activity/sedentary behavior policies.
本元分析调查了七个领域(地理、流行病学、社会文化、经济、伦理相关、政治和法律)中与背景相关的实施决定因素,这些因素在针对健康饮食和积极生活方式的肥胖预防政策实施过程中被系统地指出。
为了进行这项预先注册的元分析,从九个数据库和九个主要利益相关者的文件中搜索数据。如果在≥60%的综述/利益相关者文件中指出了与背景相关的决定因素,则认为其具有很强的支持力度。使用 ROBIS 工具和方法学质量检查表-SP 评估与质量相关的偏倚风险。
纳入了已发表的综述(k=25)和审查政策实施证据的利益相关者文件(k=17)。在文件中,以下来自三个背景领域的六个决定因素得到了强烈支持:宏观(66.7%的分析文件)和中观/微观层面(71.4%)的经济资源;中观/微观层面的社会文化背景决定因素,提及目标群体(69.0%)和实施者(73.8%)的知识/信念/能力;政治背景决定因素(71.4%的分析综述/文件中相互关联的政策得到支持;组织内的政策,69.0%)。
这些发现表明,在制定健康饮食和体力活动/久坐行为政策实施计划时,需要考虑社会文化、经济和政治背景。