Winston A, Pollack J, McCullough L, Flegenheimer W, Kestenbaum R, Trujillo M
Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY 10003.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Apr;179(4):188-93. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199104000-00002.
Thirty-two patients with personality disorder diagnoses were randomly assigned to two treatment conditions that vary on several techniques of brief dynamic psychotherapy. Seventeen patients constituted a waiting list control group. The two brief psychotherapies showed significant improvement on target complaints, SCL-90, and Social Adjustment Scale-SR compared with the control subjects. The two therapy groups were similar in overall outcome but showed interesting differences on several subscale measures. Process measurements of videotaped sessions revealed significant variations in frequencies of therapist interventions across the two treatment conditions, which validated planned differences in the treatment techniques.
32名被诊断患有精神障碍的患者被随机分配到两种治疗条件下，这两种条件在几种短程动力心理治疗技术上有所不同。17名患者组成了一个等待名单对照组。与对照组相比，两种短程心理治疗在目标主诉、症状自评量表（SCL - 90）和社会适应量表简表（Social Adjustment Scale - SR）上均显示出显著改善。两个治疗组在总体结果上相似，但在几个分量表测量上显示出有趣的差异。对录像治疗过程的测量揭示了两种治疗条件下治疗师干预频率的显著差异，这验证了治疗技术上的计划差异。
