Suppr超能文献

促使静脉镇静患者在接受眼睑局部麻醉注射时打喷嚏的因素。

Factors prompting sneezing in intravenously sedated patients receiving local anesthetic injections to the eyelids.

机构信息

Corneoplastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2010 May;117(5):1032-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.007. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the frequency of sneezing among patients receiving intravenous sedation and periocular local anesthetic for oculoplastic procedures in a single center. To identify potential risk factors involved.

DESIGN

Prospective, consecutive, interventional case series in a single tertiary-referral oculoplastic unit.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 294 patients undergoing 314 isolated oculoplastic procedures, performed under intravenous sedation with periocular local anesthetic from November 2007 to November 2008.

METHODS

Prospective data collection on patient demographics, history of photic sneezing, intravenous sedative, depth of sedation, nasal oxygen, and periocular infiltration site. Standard local anesthetic was used in all cases, but the intravenous sedation was at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist (7 in total).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sneezing or attempted sneezing within 5 minutes of injection of the local anesthetic, as determined by agreed observation between attending staff.

RESULTS

Sneezing was observed in 16% of cases. No association was found between sneezing and patient age or presence of nasal oxygen. A weakly positive association was observed with male gender (55% sneezers vs. 37% non-sneezers, P = 0.03, relative risk [RR] = 1.5, confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.0), bilateral infiltration (65% vs. 40%, P = 0.005, RR = 1.6, CI, 1.2-2.1), and upper eyelid infiltration (73% vs. 54%, P = 0.01, RR = 1.4, CI, 1.1-1.7). Photic sneezing was described in 47% of sneezers and 19% of non-sneezers (P = 0.0004, RR = 2.6, CI, 1.6-4.0). Because propofol was given to 95% of patients, no association with sneezing could be ascertained. However, opioid derivatives were found to be protective (12% vs. 43%, P<0.0001, RR = 0.3, CI, 0.1-0.6), whereas midazolam doubled the risk of sneezing (45% vs. 22%, P = 0.0008, RR = 2.1, CI, 1.4-3.0). Deep sedation (Ramsay score 5-6) also strongly increased the sneeze risk (65% vs. 23%, P<0.0001, RR = 2.8, CI, 2.1-3.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol-based intravenous sedation, in combination with periocular local anesthetic injections, induces sneezing in approximately one sixth of general oculoplastic cases. Male gender, a history of photic sneezing, bilateral or upper eyelid infiltration, deep sedation, and the concurrent administration of midazolam all increased the risk, whereas adjunctive opioid use reduced the risk.

摘要

目的

调查在单一中心接受静脉镇静和眶周局部麻醉的患者在接受眼科整形手术时打喷嚏的频率。确定涉及的潜在风险因素。

设计

单中心、前瞻性、连续的干预性病例系列研究。

参与者

2007 年 11 月至 2008 年 11 月期间,共有 294 例患者接受了 314 例孤立的眼科整形手术,这些手术均在静脉镇静和眶周局部麻醉下进行。

方法

对患者的人口统计学数据、光喷嚏史、静脉镇静剂、镇静深度、鼻氧和眶周浸润部位进行前瞻性数据收集。所有病例均使用标准局部麻醉剂,但静脉镇静剂由主治麻醉师(共 7 位)决定。

主要观察指标

根据主治人员之间的一致观察,确定在局部麻醉剂注射后 5 分钟内是否打喷嚏或试图打喷嚏。

结果

观察到 16%的病例出现打喷嚏。打喷嚏与患者年龄或是否使用鼻氧无关。男性(55%的打喷嚏者与 37%的非打喷嚏者相比,P = 0.03,相对风险 [RR] = 1.5,置信区间 [CI],1.1-2.0)、双侧浸润(65%与 40%,P = 0.005,RR = 1.6,CI,1.2-2.1)和上眼睑浸润(73%与 54%,P = 0.01,RR = 1.4,CI,1.1-1.7)与打喷嚏呈弱正相关。47%的打喷嚏者和 19%的非打喷嚏者描述了光喷嚏(P = 0.0004,RR = 2.6,CI,1.6-4.0)。由于 95%的患者给予了丙泊酚,因此无法确定与打喷嚏有关。然而,发现阿片类衍生物具有保护作用(12%与 43%相比,P<0.0001,RR = 0.3,CI,0.1-0.6),而咪达唑仑使打喷嚏的风险增加一倍(45%与 22%相比,P = 0.0008,RR = 2.1,CI,1.4-3.0)。深度镇静(Ramsay 评分 5-6)也大大增加了打喷嚏的风险(65%与 23%相比,P<0.0001,RR = 2.8,CI,2.1-3.8)。

结论

基于丙泊酚的静脉镇静剂联合眶周局部麻醉剂注射,在大约六分之一的普通眼科整形病例中会引起打喷嚏。男性、光喷嚏史、双侧或上眼睑浸润、深度镇静以及同时使用咪达唑仑都会增加风险,而辅助使用阿片类药物会降低风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验