Suppr超能文献

注意瞬脱效应:对一项任务的注意力短暂增强会提高第二项任务的表现。

The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Sciences, University of Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2010 Apr;115(1):118-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

Abstract

Recent work on event perception suggests that perceptual processing increases when events change. An important question is how such changes influence the way other information is processed, particularly during dual-task performance. In this study, participants monitored a long series of distractor items for an occasional target as they simultaneously encoded unrelated background scenes. The appearance of an occasional target could have two opposite effects on the secondary task: It could draw attention away from the second task, or, as a change in the ongoing event, it could improve secondary task performance. Results were consistent with the second possibility. Memory for scenes presented simultaneously with the targets was better than memory for scenes that preceded or followed the targets. This effect was observed when the primary detection task involved visual feature oddball detection, auditory oddball detection, and visual color-shape conjunction detection. It was eliminated when the detection task was omitted, and when it required an arbitrary response mapping. The appearance of occasional, task-relevant events appears to trigger a temporal orienting response that facilitates processing of concurrently attended information (Attentional Boost Effect).

摘要

最近关于事件感知的研究表明,当事件发生变化时,感知处理会增强。一个重要的问题是,这种变化如何影响其他信息的处理方式,特别是在双重任务表现中。在这项研究中,参与者在同时编码不相关背景场景的情况下,长时间监测一系列分散注意力的项目,以寻找偶尔出现的目标。偶尔出现的目标可能对次要任务产生两种相反的影响:它可能会分散对次要任务的注意力,或者,作为正在进行的事件的变化,它可能会提高次要任务的表现。结果与第二种可能性一致。与目标同时呈现的场景的记忆比目标之前或之后呈现的场景的记忆要好。当主要检测任务涉及视觉特征奇数检测、听觉奇数检测和视觉颜色形状结合检测时,就会观察到这种效果。当检测任务被省略,并且需要任意响应映射时,这种效果就会消除。偶尔出现的、与任务相关的事件的出现似乎会引发时间定向反应,从而促进同时关注的信息的处理(注意提升效应)。

相似文献

1
The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task.
Cognition. 2010 Apr;115(1):118-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
3
Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.
Psychol Res. 2010 May;74(3):255-67. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0246-y. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
4
Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jun;29(12):2426-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06774.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
5
Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Mar 15;433(3):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.01.031. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
6
Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
Brain Res. 2017 Jun 1;1664:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.03.026. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
7
Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Brain Res. 2007 Sep 19;1170:71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.023. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
8
A cuing study of the N2pc component: an index of attentional deployment to objects rather than spatial locations.
Brain Res. 2009 Nov 10;1297:101-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
9
Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Apr 11;435(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.02.017. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
10
Orienting attention based on long-term memory experience.
Neuron. 2006 Mar 16;49(6):905-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.021.

引用本文的文献

2
The standard and reversed attentional boost effects in a joint action task.
Mem Cognit. 2025 May 30. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01735-8.
4
Temporal smearing across related visual images eliminates the attentional boost effect.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):752-767. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03047-0. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
5
The attentional boost effect: current landscape and future directions.
Cogn Process. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01266-9.
8
Recognition memory fluctuates with sustained attention regardless of task relevance.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):714-728. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02560-x. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Surprising sounds influence risky decision making.
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 13;15(1):8027. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51729-4.
10
The modulation of temporal predictability on attentional boost effect.
Brain Behav. 2024 Sep;14(9):e3653. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3653.

本文引用的文献

1
Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search?
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Sep;3(3):360-5. doi: 10.3758/BF03210761.
2
The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Mar;2(1):105-12. doi: 10.3758/BF03214414.
3
Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May;138(2):236-57. doi: 10.1037/a0015631.
4
A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):836-63. doi: 10.1037/a0013395.
5
Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1053-65. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1053.
6
Task-irrelevant learning occurs only when the irrelevant feature is weak.
Curr Biol. 2008 Jun 24;18(12):R516-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.029.
7
Bleeping you out of the blink: sound saves vision from oblivion.
Brain Res. 2008 Nov 25;1242:191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.070. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
8
Event perception: a mind-brain perspective.
Psychol Bull. 2007 Mar;133(2):273-93. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273.
9
A common framework for perceptual learning.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Apr;17(2):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
10
The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory.
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):38-70. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.38.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验