• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言能力对英语音频句子中分割边界处选择性注意模式的影响。

Effects of Language Proficiency on Selective Attention Patterns at Segmenting Boundaries in English Audio Sentences.

作者信息

Mei Yunhao, Chen Fei, Chen Xiaoxiang

机构信息

School of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Lushannan Road No. 2, Yuelu District, Changsha 410082, China.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 28;14(12):1204. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121204.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci14121204
PMID:39766403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11674264/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Normative perceptual segmentation facilitates event perception, comprehension, and memory. Given that native English listeners' normative perceptual segmentation of English speech streams coexists with a highly selective attention pattern at segmentation boundaries, it is significant to test whether Chinese learners of English have a different attention pattern at boundaries, thereby checking whether they perform a normative segmentation.

METHODS

Thirty Chinese learners of English with relatively higher language proficiency (CLH) and 26 with relatively lower language proficiency (CLL) listened to a series of English audio sentences. Meanwhile, they were asked to press the key whenever a phonetic probe "ba" occurred. Response time to "ba" reflects the attention where "ba" is located at segmentation boundaries.

RESULTS

The results revealed that, (1) relative to native English listeners' highly selective attention pattern, the CLH group showed a relatively selective attention pattern, while the CLL group displayed a non-selective attention pattern. (2) Both the CLH group and natives had better recognition memory than the CLL group. (3) Both the CLH group and natives' attention at segmentation boundaries was not correlated with their memory for sentences, while the CLL group's attention at boundaries was correlated with memory.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that (1) Chinese learners of English did not perform a normative segmentation, which shows the effect of English proficiency on perceptual segmentation; (2) English proficiency has a superior effect on memory for sentences, while perceptual segmentation would come next to support memory by providing structure for memory construction if English proficiency is not high; (3) a comparison of attention patterns between Chinese learners and natives can provide a reference for potential intervention to rectify non-natives, thereby improving their perception of English speech streams.

摘要

背景/目的:规范的感知分割有助于事件感知、理解和记忆。鉴于以英语为母语的听众对英语语音流的规范感知分割与分割边界处高度选择性的注意模式并存,测试中国英语学习者在边界处是否具有不同的注意模式,从而检查他们是否进行规范分割具有重要意义。

方法

30名语言水平相对较高的中国英语学习者(CLH)和26名语言水平相对较低的中国英语学习者(CLL)听了一系列英语音频句子。同时,要求他们每当出现语音探针“ba”时就按下按键。对“ba”的反应时间反映了“ba”在分割边界处的注意力。

结果

结果显示,(1)相对于以英语为母语的听众高度选择性的注意模式,CLH组表现出相对选择性的注意模式,而CLL组表现出非选择性的注意模式。(2)CLH组和以英语为母语的人都比CLL组有更好的识别记忆。(3)CLH组和以英语为母语的人在分割边界处的注意力与他们对句子的记忆无关,而CLL组在边界处的注意力与记忆相关。

结论

这些发现表明,(1)中国英语学习者没有进行规范分割,这显示了英语水平对感知分割的影响;(2)英语水平对句子记忆有更显著的影响,而如果英语水平不高,感知分割会通过为记忆构建提供结构来支持记忆;(3)比较中国学习者和以英语为母语的人的注意模式可以为纠正非母语者的潜在干预提供参考,从而改善他们对英语语音流的感知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/a7d9f571693d/brainsci-14-01204-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/73ddcf0fc98e/brainsci-14-01204-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/be29bb5fbdf4/brainsci-14-01204-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/d065b9744fbe/brainsci-14-01204-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/76fdc9261f5d/brainsci-14-01204-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/96d908004b70/brainsci-14-01204-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/180a7307656a/brainsci-14-01204-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/c3630388d0c9/brainsci-14-01204-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/954d1a7e9a43/brainsci-14-01204-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/627ed2c5f643/brainsci-14-01204-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/7448e993ad4a/brainsci-14-01204-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/a7d9f571693d/brainsci-14-01204-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/73ddcf0fc98e/brainsci-14-01204-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/be29bb5fbdf4/brainsci-14-01204-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/d065b9744fbe/brainsci-14-01204-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/76fdc9261f5d/brainsci-14-01204-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/96d908004b70/brainsci-14-01204-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/180a7307656a/brainsci-14-01204-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/c3630388d0c9/brainsci-14-01204-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/954d1a7e9a43/brainsci-14-01204-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/627ed2c5f643/brainsci-14-01204-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/7448e993ad4a/brainsci-14-01204-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c7/11674264/a7d9f571693d/brainsci-14-01204-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Language Proficiency on Selective Attention Patterns at Segmenting Boundaries in English Audio Sentences.语言能力对英语音频句子中分割边界处选择性注意模式的影响。
Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 28;14(12):1204. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121204.
2
Chinese EFL learners different from English natives in cataphora resolution: Evidence from eye-tracking studies.中国英语学习者在指代消解方面与以英语为母语者不同:来自眼动追踪研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1126673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126673. eCollection 2023.
3
Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.对第二语言的体验会影响语音分割中基频的使用。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181709. eCollection 2017.
4
Effects of the Native Language on the Learning of Fundamental Frequency in Second-Language Speech Segmentation.母语对第二语言语音分割中基频学习的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 29;7:985. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00985. eCollection 2016.
5
Neural correlates of processing active and passive sentences: proficiency-dependent event-related potential evidence in Chinese English foreign language learners.主动句与被动句加工的神经关联:中国英语外语学习者中熟练度依赖的事件相关电位证据
Neuroreport. 2024 Mar 20;35(5):337-342. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000002014. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
6
Prosodic cue weighting in the processing of ambiguous sentences by native English listeners and Korean listeners of English.母语为英语的英语听众和韩国英语听众对歧义句的韵律线索加权处理。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jan;151(1):158. doi: 10.1121/10.0009171.
7
Spoken Word Segmentation in First and Second Language: When ERP and Behavioral Measures Diverge.第一语言和第二语言中的口语单词分割:当事件相关电位与行为测量结果出现分歧时。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 17;12:705668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.705668. eCollection 2021.
8
Towards a More Inclusive Learning Environment: The Importance of Providing Captions That Are Suited to Learners' Language Proficiency in the UDL Classroom.迈向更具包容性的学习环境:在 UDL 课堂中为学习者的语言熟练程度提供适配的字幕的重要性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Sep 2;297:533-540. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220884.
9
Effects of Second Language Proficiency and Linguistic Uncertainty on Recognition of Speech in Native and Nonnative Competing Speech.第二语言熟练度和语言不确定性对母语和非母语竞争语音识别的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jul 13;61(7):1815-1830. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0254.
10
Audiovisual perception of interrupted speech by nonnative listeners.非母语者对中断言语的视听感知。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1763-1776. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02909-3. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Phrase parsing in a second language as indexed by the closure positive shift: The impact of language experience and acoustic cue salience.以闭包正性偏移为指标的第二语言短语解析:语言经验和声学线索显著性的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Oct;58(8):3838-3858. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16134. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
2
Acoustic features drive event segmentation in speech.声学特征驱动语音中的事件分割。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Sep;49(9):1494-1504. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001150. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
3
The effects of domain knowledge and event structure on event processing.
领域知识和事件结构对事件处理的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jan;51(1):101-114. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01309-y. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
Event segmentation and event boundary advantage: Role of attention and postencoding processing.事件分割和事件边界优势:注意力和后编码处理的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1542-1555. doi: 10.1037/xge0001155. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Influences of domain knowledge on segmentation and memory.领域知识对分割和记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):660-674. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01118-1. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
Culture influences how people divide continuous sensory experience into events.文化影响人们如何将连续的感官体验划分为事件。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104450. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104450. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
Linguistic Information in Auditory Dynamic Events Contributes to the Detection of Fine, Not Coarse Event Boundaries.听觉动态事件中的语言信息有助于检测精细而非粗略的事件边界。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2019 Mar 31;15(1):30-40. doi: 10.5709/acp-0254-9. eCollection 2019.
8
Universals of listening: Equivalent prosodic entrainment in tone and non-tone languages.听觉普遍性:声调语言与非声调语言中同等的韵律同步。
Cognition. 2020 Sep;202:104311. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104311. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
9
Event Perception and Memory.事件感知和记忆。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:165-191. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051101.
10
Differential effects of knowledge and aging on the encoding and retrieval of everyday activities.知识和衰老对日常活动编码与检索的差异影响。
Cognition. 2020 Mar;196:104159. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104159. Epub 2019 Dec 19.