Wang Marvin L, Macklin Eric A, Tracy Erin, Nadel Hiyam, Catlin Elizabeth A
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010 Feb;49(2):130-6. doi: 10.1177/0009922809346569.
Through a questionnaire, the authors sought to elicit information about initial attitudes concerning circumcision after reading a summary of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement and, again, after reading a description of recent HIV/HPV studies. Predictors of increased support for circumcision included having a prior circumcised boy and being US born. Predictors of decreased support included being of Hispanic ethnicity and believing that the uncircumcised penis was more culturally normal. After reading the AAP statement, 86% of respondents remained favorable of elective circumcision, whereas 13% viewed it less favorably. After reading the passage about the HIV/HPV studies, the majority maintained their initial level of support. Certain characteristics were associated with an individual's desire to perform circumcision on his/her infant. Despite a slight decrease in support to perform circumcision after reading the AAP policy summary, respondents' initial attitudes toward circumcision were unchanged after subsequent review of recent HIV/HPV research.
通过一份调查问卷,作者试图获取相关信息,了解受试者在阅读美国儿科学会(AAP)政策声明摘要后,以及再次阅读近期艾滋病毒/人乳头瘤病毒研究描述后,对包皮环切术的初始态度。支持增加包皮环切术的预测因素包括有一个之前接受过包皮环切术的男孩以及在美国出生。支持减少的预测因素包括西班牙裔种族以及认为未割包皮的阴茎在文化上更正常。阅读AAP声明后,86%的受访者仍然支持选择性包皮环切术,而13%的人则不太支持。阅读关于艾滋病毒/人乳头瘤病毒研究的段落后,大多数人维持了他们最初的支持水平。某些特征与个人对其婴儿进行包皮环切术的意愿相关。尽管在阅读AAP政策摘要后支持进行包皮环切术的比例略有下降,但在随后回顾近期艾滋病毒/人乳头瘤病毒研究后,受访者对包皮环切术的初始态度并未改变。