Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Rheumatol. 2010 Mar;37(3):591-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090375. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
We studied a large clinical practice and multicenter database to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) using global rating of change anchors for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and visual analog scale (VAS) in pain, fatigue, sleep, global status, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in clinical practice.
Longitudinal data were collected from a scleroderma clinic on patients with scleroderma (n = 109) who had completed the HAQ-DI and pain/fatigue/sleep/global status VAS (0 to 100 mm) questionnaires at 2 consecutive visits, and rated their change in overall status since the last visit as much better, better, same, worse, or much worse. Data were extracted from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) database (n = 341) for 2 consecutive annual visits where the patients had completed HAQ-DI and SF-36, and the SF-36 "change in health" item.
For the single site, the mean baseline HAQ-DI was 0.895 and 0.911 at followup, with a mean change of 0.016. The MID estimates for improvement and worsening respectively were -0.0125 (0.125, 75th percentile)/0.042 (0.217, 75th percentile) for HAQ-DI, -8.00/3.61 for pain, -10.00/3.79 (25.32) for fatigue, -18.50/5.92 for sleep, and -6.70/4.05 for global VAS. In the CSRG, baseline scores were 0.787 for HAQ-DI, 37.20 for the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of SF-36, and 48.57 for the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The MID estimates for improvement and worsening were -0.037 (0.250, 75th percentile)/0.140 (0.375, 75th percentile) for HAQ-DI, 2.18/-1.74 for PCS, and 1.33/-2.61 for MCS.
This study provides MID estimates in SSc from 2 large databases for commonly used patient-reported outcomes in a clinical practice setting, which could differ from MID in trials.
我们研究了一个大型临床实践和多中心数据库,使用健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)和疼痛、疲劳、睡眠、整体状况以及医疗结局研究 36 项短表(SF-36)的视觉模拟量表(VAS)的整体变化锚定物来估计系统性硬化症(SSc)的最小有意义差异(MID)。
在一个硬皮病诊所,对连续两次就诊时完成 HAQ-DI 和疼痛/疲劳/睡眠/整体状况 VAS(0 到 100mm)问卷并在上次就诊后对整体状况变化进行评估的硬皮病患者(n=109)进行了纵向数据收集,评估结果为好得多、更好、相同、更差或差得多。从加拿大硬皮病研究组(CSRG)数据库(n=341)提取了连续两年就诊的数据,患者在这两年就诊时均完成了 HAQ-DI 和 SF-36,以及 SF-36“健康变化”项目。
在单一地点,基线时 HAQ-DI 的平均值为 0.895,随访时为 0.911,平均变化为 0.016。HAQ-DI 改善和恶化的 MID 估计值分别为-0.0125(0.125,75 百分位)/0.042(0.217,75 百分位),疼痛为-8.00/3.61,疲劳为-10.00/3.79(25.32),睡眠为-18.50/5.92,全球 VAS 为-6.70/4.05。在 CSRG 中,HAQ-DI 的基线评分为 0.787,SF-36 的生理成分综合评分(PCS)为 37.20,心理成分综合评分(MCS)为 48.57。HAQ-DI 改善和恶化的 MID 估计值分别为-0.037(0.250,75 百分位)/0.140(0.375,75 百分位),PCS 为 2.18/-1.74,MCS 为 1.33/-2.61。
这项研究提供了来自两个大型数据库的 SSc 中常用患者报告结局的 MID 估计值,这些估计值可能与临床试验中的 MID 不同。