Suppr超能文献

血管腔内主动脉修复术后内漏:胸、腹主动脉血管腔内修复术后的分类、诊断及处理

Endoleak after endovascular aortic repair: classification, diagnosis and management following endovascular thoracic and abdominal aortic repair.

作者信息

Cao P, De Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G

机构信息

Operative Unit of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiosciences, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Feb;51(1):53-69.

Abstract

Endoleak is a common and unique complication of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and its persistence represents a failure of the endovascular treatment. Accurate detection and classification is essential for the proper management since the method of endoleak treatment is determined by the different source. In general, high-pressure leaks (type I and type III) require urgent management because of the relatively high short-term risk of sac rupture. Although precise differentiation between type I and type III endoleaks may not be possible at cross- sectional imaging, differentiation is often unnecessary because both lesions are considered high-risk and require angiographic evaluation and subsequent treatment. Low-pressure lesions (types II and V or endotension) are considered less urgent but may warrant continued endovascular evaluation if there is impending growth of the aneurysm sac or if the patient presents with symptoms. Once detected, endoleaks warranting correction (all type I and III; persistent endotension and type II associated with aneurysm enlargement) are usually treated by endovascular route. A variety of techniques including extension endografts or cuff, balloon angioplasty, bare stents and a combination of transvascular and direct sac puncture embolization techniques has allowed to treat the vast majority of these endoleaks without conversion to open surgical repair. Type II endoleak continues to be the most common but also the most controversial in terms of evaluation, the need of treatment, and methods of treatment. Careful and rigorous postoperative lifelong follow-up with computed tomography (CT) and high quality imaging continue to be essential for all patients after EVAR.

摘要

内漏是血管腔内主动脉修复术(EVAR)常见且独特的并发症,内漏持续存在代表血管腔内治疗失败。准确检测和分类对于恰当处理至关重要,因为内漏的治疗方法取决于不同的来源。一般来说,高压性漏血(I型和III型)由于瘤腔破裂的短期风险相对较高,需要紧急处理。尽管在横断面成像时可能无法精确区分I型和III型内漏,但通常无需区分,因为这两种病变都被视为高危病变,需要进行血管造影评估及后续治疗。低压性病变(II型和V型或内张力)被认为紧迫性较低,但如果动脉瘤瘤腔有增大趋势或患者出现症状,则可能需要持续的血管腔内评估。一旦发现需要纠正的内漏(所有I型和III型;持续性内张力以及与动脉瘤增大相关的II型),通常采用血管腔内途径治疗。包括延长型人工血管或袖套、球囊血管成形术、裸支架以及经血管和直接瘤腔穿刺栓塞技术相结合等多种技术,已能够治疗绝大多数此类内漏,而无需转为开放手术修复。II型内漏仍然是最常见的,但在评估、治疗需求和治疗方法方面也是最具争议的。对于所有接受EVAR治疗后的患者,术后进行仔细、严格的终身计算机断层扫描(CT)和高质量成像随访仍然至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验