Mininni Giuseppe
University of Bari Aldo Moro - Department of Psychology, Bari, Italy.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2010 Mar;44(1):23-9. doi: 10.1007/s12124-009-9111-1.
The text aims to give a contribution to the discussion raised by Grossen on two relevant issues: the way the dialogical construction of meaning overlaps with the interactional format of the human experience and the degree of congruence between the theoretical asset of dialogism and the whole of techniques which could be adopted within human sciences. Till now dialogism appears to be more a seductive theoretical perspective rather than a convincing methodological apparel. Diatextualism may be viewed as the conceptual and procedural framework able to fruitfully posit psychology into the realm of the "dialogical sciences", because it is focussed on the "dialogical rationality" coming out from the relationship between transaction of meanings and interaction of actors.
意义的对话构建与人类经验的互动形式重叠的方式,以及对话主义的理论资源与人文科学中可采用的全部技术之间的契合程度。到目前为止,对话主义似乎更多是一种诱人的理论视角,而非令人信服的方法论工具。文本间性理论可被视为一个概念性和程序性框架,它能够卓有成效地将心理学置于“对话科学”领域,因为它关注的是意义交流与行动者互动之间关系所产生的“对话理性”。