Murakami Kyoko
Department of Education, University of Bath, Bath, England, UK.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2010 Mar;44(1):30-8. doi: 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x.
This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen's ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-22, 2009) and highlights a process account of self in interaction. Firstly I draw on Turner's concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.
本文追溯了我对米歇勒·格罗森关于互动分析的对话视角观点的探讨(《格罗森综合心理与行为科学》,2009年第1 - 22页),并着重阐述了互动中自我的过程性描述。首先,我借鉴了特纳关于阈限性的概念,涉及互动中变革性的、具有时间意义的方面。其次,我进一步探讨了会话分析概念,如表述和重新表述,将其作为对话视角的一种可行分析工具。最后,我探讨了机构环境中的互动问题,特别是互动中的互动不对称问题,同时对“我”立场的对话视角进行了相对化处理。我探索了社会人类学的见解,并重新审视了会话分析和话语心理学,得出结论:一个有前景的方向将通过对话主义与其他关于语言使用、沟通、社会行动以及基于话语和叙事分析的相关视角之间的相互交融来寻求。