Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Sep;21(5):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
One outcome measure of law enforcement effectiveness is the reduction in drug consumption which occurs as a result of law enforcement interventions. A theoretical relationship between drug consumption and retail price has promoted the use of retail price as a surrogate measure for consumption. In the current article, retail price is examined as a potential outcome measure for the effectiveness of law enforcement. The predictions regarding the relationship between law enforcement intensity and price are only partially supported by research. Explanations for the disconnect between the drug law enforcement activity and retail price include: rapid adaptation by market players, enforcement swamping, assumptions of rational actors, short-run versus long-run effects, structure of the illicit market, simultaneous changes that affect price in perverse ways, the role of violence in markets, and data limitations. Researchers who use retail price as an outcome measure need to take into account the complex relationship between drug law enforcement interventions and the retail price of illicit drugs. Viable outcome measures which can be used as complements to retail price are worth investigation.
执法效果的一个衡量标准是执法干预导致的毒品消费减少。毒品消费与零售价格之间的理论关系促使人们将零售价格用作消费的替代衡量标准。在本文中,零售价格被视为执法效果的潜在结果衡量标准。关于执法力度与价格之间关系的预测仅得到部分研究的支持。毒品执法活动与零售价格之间脱节的原因包括:市场参与者的快速适应、执法泛滥、理性行为者的假设、短期与长期效应、非法市场结构、同时发生的以相反方式影响价格的变化、暴力在市场中的作用以及数据限制。将零售价格用作结果衡量标准的研究人员需要考虑毒品执法干预与非法毒品零售价格之间的复杂关系。值得研究可以作为零售价格补充的可行结果衡量标准。