Orthodontic Department, University of Dundee Dental Hospital and School, UK.
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Apr;32(2):177-85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp067. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
The objective of this study was to evaluate asymmetry of the parental craniofacial skeleton of subjects with a cleft lip, with or without cleft palate [CL(P)], and isolated cleft palate (CP). The postero-anterior (PA) cephalograms of 52 parents of children with CL(P) and 40 parents of children with CP from a sample of 196 children with non-syndromic clefts in the west of Scotland were analysed. A conventional cephalometric asymmetry analysis was used to evaluate size-related right:left asymmetry comprising eight linear distances, nine angular, and three facial area measurements. Right:left ratios of the mean values identified the direction of the asymmetry and two-sample t-tests determined statistical significance. A shape-related asymmetry analysis was also undertaken. The configurations of landmarks were optimally superimposed and scaled using Procrustes algorithms. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA) was then compared and the shape of the left and the right landmark configurations were statistically tested using a non-parametric bootstrap technique. For the parents of CL(P) children, size-related asymmetry was identified and the area of the craniofacial polygon was statistically significantly larger on the right than on the left side. EDMA detected the presence of shape-related asymmetry (T statistic = 1.304; P = 0.003). For the parents of CP children, although size-related asymmetry was identified, EDMA did not identify shape-related asymmetry (T statistic = 1.281; P = 0.065). Size and shape directional asymmetries are characteristic features of the parental craniofacial skeleton in CL(P). Although directional size asymmetry is present in the parental craniofacial skeleton in CP, shape asymmetry is not a characteristic feature.
本研究旨在评估唇裂伴或不伴腭裂(CL(P))以及单纯腭裂(CP)患者父母颅面骨骼的不对称性。对来自苏格兰西部 196 例非综合征性腭裂患儿样本中 52 例 CL(P)患儿的父母和 40 例 CP 患儿的父母的后前位(PA)头颅侧位片进行了分析。采用传统的头影测量不对称性分析方法,评估了与大小相关的右侧/左侧不对称性,包括 8 个线性距离、9 个角度和 3 个面部区域测量值。平均值的右/左比值确定了不对称的方向,两样本 t 检验确定了统计学意义。还进行了与形状相关的不对称性分析。使用 Procrustes 算法对标志点的配置进行了最佳叠加和缩放。然后比较欧几里得距离矩阵分析(EDMA),并使用非参数自举技术对左侧和右侧标志点配置的形状进行统计学检验。对于 CL(P)患儿的父母,发现了与大小相关的不对称性,且颅面多边形的面积在右侧显著大于左侧。EDMA 检测到了与形状相关的不对称性(T 统计量=1.304;P=0.003)。对于 CP 患儿的父母,尽管发现了与大小相关的不对称性,但 EDMA 并未识别出与形状相关的不对称性(T 统计量=1.281;P=0.065)。大小和形状的定向不对称是 CL(P)患者父母颅面骨骼的特征性特征。尽管 CP 患者父母的颅面骨骼存在定向大小不对称性,但形状不对称不是其特征性特征。