• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境系统与地方行为者:乌干达环境政策的权力下放。

Environmental systems and local actors: decentralizing environmental policy in Uganda.

机构信息

Wageningen University, Environmental Policy, P.O. Box 8130, Wageningen 6700EW, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2010 Feb;45(2):284-95. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9423-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-009-9423-4
PMID:20084511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2819457/
Abstract

In Uganda, environmental and natural resource management is decentralized and has been the responsibility of local districts since 1996. This environmental management arrangement was part of a broader decentralization process and was intended to increase local ownership and improve environmental policy; however, its implementation has encountered several major challenges over the last decade. This article reviews some of the key structural problems facing decentralized environmental policy in this central African country and examines these issues within the wider framework of political decentralization. Tensions have arisen between technical staff and politicians, between various levels of governance, and between environmental and other policy domains. This review offers a critical reflection on the perspectives and limitations of decentralized environmental governance in Uganda. Our conclusions focus on the need to balance administrative staff and local politicians, the mainstreaming of local environmental policy, and the role of international donors.

摘要

在乌干达,环境和自然资源管理权力下放,自 1996 年以来一直由地方行政区负责。这种环境管理安排是更广泛权力下放进程的一部分,旨在增强地方所有权并改善环境政策;然而,过去十年中,这一安排的实施遇到了一些重大挑战。本文审查了在这个中部非洲国家中,分散的环境政策所面临的一些关键结构问题,并在更广泛的政治权力下放框架内审查了这些问题。技术人员与政治家之间、各级政府之间以及环境政策和其他政策领域之间都出现了紧张关系。本文的审查对乌干达分散式环境治理的观点和局限性进行了批判性反思。我们的结论侧重于需要平衡行政人员和地方政治家、将地方环境政策纳入主流以及国际捐助者的作用。

相似文献

1
Environmental systems and local actors: decentralizing environmental policy in Uganda.环境系统与地方行为者:乌干达环境政策的权力下放。
Environ Manage. 2010 Feb;45(2):284-95. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9423-4.
2
Decentralization, national context and environmental policy performance: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.权力下放、国家背景与环境政策绩效:模糊集定性比较分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Oct;25(28):28471-28488. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2846-9. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
3
Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government.当用户群体与地方政府合作时,权力下放有助于减少森林砍伐。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):14958-14963. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610650114. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
4
Attitudes and perceptions of stakeholders on decentralization of health services in Uganda: the case of Lira and Apac districts.乌干达利益相关者对卫生服务分权的态度和看法:以利拉区和阿帕克区为例
East Afr Med J. 2004 Feb;Suppl:S8-11.
5
Political economy analysis of subnational health management in Kenya, Malawi and Uganda.肯尼亚、马拉维和乌干达的国家以下卫生管理的政治经济学分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 May 17;38(5):631-647. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad021.
6
A Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF) for analyzing decentralized forest governance: case study from Ethiopia.用于分析去中心化森林治理的改良行为者-权力-问责制框架(MAPAF):来自埃塞俄比亚的案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Jun 15;139:188-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
7
Who is in and who is out? A qualitative analysis of stakeholder participation in priority setting for health in three districts in Uganda.谁参与,谁不参与?乌干达三个地区卫生重点制定中的利益攸关方参与情况的定性分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jun 1;34(5):358-369. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz049.
8
Impact of decentralization on health services in Uganda: a look at facility utilization, prescribing and availability of essential drugs.权力下放对乌干达卫生服务的影响:对医疗机构利用率、基本药物处方及可及性的考察
East Afr Med J. 2004 Feb;Suppl:S2-7.
9
Issues in natural resources management in developing countries.发展中国家自然资源管理中的问题。
Nat Resour Forum. 1994 May;18(2):115-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.1994.tb00881.x.
10
Municipal health services provision by local governments: a systematic review of experiences in decentralized Sub-Saharan African countries.地方政府提供城市卫生服务:分散的撒哈拉以南非洲国家经验的系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(9):1327-1336. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx082.

引用本文的文献

1
Aspirations and realities of intergovernmental collaboration in national- level interventions: insights from maternal, neonatal and child health policy processes in Nigeria, 2009-2019.国家层面干预措施中政府间合作的愿望与现实:2009-2019 年尼日利亚母婴和儿童健康政策过程的见解。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Feb;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010186.
2
Look Who's Talking. Explaining Water-Related Information Sharing and Demand for Action Among Ugandan Villagers.看看是谁在说话。解读乌干达村民之间与水相关的信息共享及行动需求
Environ Manage. 2016 Nov;58(5):780-796. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0760-9. Epub 2016 Sep 9.