Smaldone G C, Fuhrer J, Steigbigel R T, McPeck M
Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794-8172.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Apr;143(4 Pt 1):727-37. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_Pt_1.727.
Although aerosolized pentamidine (AP) has recently been approved for prophylaxis and is undergoing clinical trials for treatment of pneumocystis, pneumonia (PCP), factors important in the deposition of AP have not been described. Using radioaerosol techniques, deposition was measured in 22 patients receiving AP for prophylaxis or treatment of PCP. In all patients total and regional deposition of pentamidine, breathing pattern, pulmonary function (PFT), regional ventilation, and type of nebulizer were analyzed. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed 24 h after inhalation to assess the relationship between pentamidine levels in BAL fluid and measured aerosol deposition. The nebulizers tested were the Marquest Respirgard II and the Cadema AeroTech II, both previously characterized in our laboratory. The aerosol particles consist of water droplets containing dissolved pentamidine and technetium 99m bound to albumin. Analysis of particles sampled during inhalation via cascade impaction confirmed a close relationship between radioactivity in the droplets and the concentration of pentamidine as measured by HPLC (r = 0.971, p less than 0.0001; n = 18). Deposition was measured by capturing inhaled and exhaled particles on absolute filters and measuring radioactivity. This technique allows the determination of the deposition fraction (DF, the fraction of the amount inhaled that is deposited), which provides information on factors strictly related to the patient. To confirm the filter measurements, pentamidine deposition was also measured by gamma camera. The camera measurement was possible because each patient's thoracic attenuation of radioactivity was determined by a quantitative perfusion scan (mg pentamidine deposited via both techniques, r = 0.949, p less than 0.0001; n = 26). Regional lung volume and ventilation were determined by xenon 133 equilibrium scan and washout. Pentamidine deposition varied markedly between patients, but BAL levels of pentamidine significantly correlated with measured deposition (r = 0.819, p less than 0.01; n = 9). DF averaged 0.621 +/- 0.027 (SEM) and did not correlate with any measured lung parameter, including breathing pattern and PFT. Regional deposition did not correlate with regional ventilation. The major factor influencing pentamidine deposition was aerosol delivery (mg deposited versus mg inhaled; r = 0.963, p less than 0.0001; n = 26). The nebulizer was an important determinant of aerosol delivery, with the AeroTech delivering between 2.5 and 5 times more drug than the Respirgard. These observations are important in assessing treatment failure and cost of therapy.
虽然雾化喷他脒(AP)最近已被批准用于预防,并且正在进行治疗肺孢子菌肺炎(PCP)的临床试验,但尚未描述影响AP沉积的重要因素。采用放射性气溶胶技术,对22例接受AP预防或治疗PCP的患者进行了沉积测量。分析了所有患者喷他脒的总沉积和局部沉积、呼吸模式、肺功能(PFT)、局部通气和雾化器类型。吸入后24小时进行支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL),以评估BAL液中喷他脒水平与测量的气溶胶沉积之间的关系。所测试的雾化器为Marquest Respirgard II和Cadema AeroTech II,这两种雾化器此前均在我们实验室进行过特性分析。气溶胶颗粒由含有溶解喷他脒和与白蛋白结合的锝99m的水滴组成。通过级联冲击法对吸入过程中采集的颗粒进行分析,证实了液滴中的放射性与通过高效液相色谱法测量的喷他脒浓度之间存在密切关系(r = 0.971, p < 0.0001; n = 18)。通过在绝对滤器上捕获吸入和呼出的颗粒并测量放射性来测量沉积。该技术可确定沉积分数(DF,吸入量中沉积的部分),它提供了与患者密切相关的因素的信息。为了确认滤器测量结果,还通过γ相机测量了喷他脒的沉积。由于通过定量灌注扫描确定了每位患者胸部的放射性衰减,因此可以进行相机测量(两种技术测得的喷他脒沉积量,r = 0.949, p < 0.0001; n = 26)。通过氙133平衡扫描和洗脱确定局部肺容积和通气。患者之间喷他脒的沉积差异显著,但BAL中的喷他脒水平与测量的沉积显著相关(r = 0.819, p < 0.01; n = 9)。DF平均为0.621±0.027(SEM),与任何测量的肺参数均无相关性,包括呼吸模式和PFT。局部沉积与局部通气无关。影响喷他脒沉积的主要因素是气溶胶输送量(沉积的毫克数与吸入的毫克数;r = 0.963, p < 0.0001; n = 26)。雾化器是气溶胶输送的重要决定因素,AeroTech输送的药物比Respirgard多2.5至5倍。这些观察结果对于评估治疗失败和治疗成本具有重要意义。