Ghannam D E, Rodriguez G H, Raad I I, Safdar A
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, Unit 402, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Mar;28(3):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0620-5. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
We sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of inhaled aminoglycosides or colistin in cancer patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). A retrospective case-matched study was obtained after obtaining IRB approval in patients at the intensive care unit at our NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center between 1999 and 2005. Sixteen patients with GNB-VAP who received inhaled aminoglycosides or colistin were compared with 16 patients who had received these antibiotics intravenously alone. Eligible patients were required to have received at least six doses of inhaled therapy, or 3 or more days of intravenous therapy. Clinical Pulmonary Infection Scores were used to assess pneumonia severity. Standard ATS criteria were used to define VAP. Patients treated with inhaled antibiotics were less likely to have received corticosteroids (13% vs 50%; P < 0.02) and had a higher median baseline creatinine level (0.85 vs 0.6 mg/dL; P < 0.02) than patients treated intravenously. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (69%) was the most common cause of VAP. There were no serious adverse events associated with inhaled antibiotics. Patients who received these antibiotics intravenously developed renal dysfunction (31%); none of the patients treated with inhaled antibiotics developed nephrotoxicity (P < or = 0.04). Patients treated with inhaled antibiotics were more likely to have complete resolution of clinical (81% vs 31% in the intravenous antibiotic group; P < 0.01) and microbiologic infection (77% vs 8% in the intravenous antibiotic group: P < 0.0006). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for corticosteroid use, inhaled antibiotic therapy was predictive of complete clinical resolution (odds ratio [OR], 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1, 37.6; P < 0.04) and eradication of causative organisms (OR 36.7; 95% CI, 3.3, 412.2; P < 0.003). In critically ill cancer patients with Gram-negative VAP, inhaled aminoglycosides were tolerated without serious toxicity and may lead to improved outcome.
我们旨在评估吸入用氨基糖苷类药物或多黏菌素用于因革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)引起呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的癌症患者的安全性和可行性。在获得机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,我们对1999年至2005年间在我们国家癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心重症监护病房的患者进行了一项回顾性病例匹配研究。将16例接受吸入用氨基糖苷类药物或多黏菌素治疗的GNB-VAP患者与16例仅接受静脉注射这些抗生素治疗的患者进行比较。符合条件的患者需接受至少六剂吸入治疗,或3天或更长时间的静脉治疗。采用临床肺部感染评分来评估肺炎严重程度。使用标准的美国胸科学会(ATS)标准来定义VAP。与静脉治疗的患者相比,接受吸入用抗生素治疗的患者接受皮质类固醇治疗的可能性较小(13%对50%;P<0.02),且基线肌酐水平中位数较高(0.85对0.6mg/dL;P<0.02)。铜绿假单胞菌(69%)是VAP最常见的病因。吸入用抗生素未发生严重不良事件。接受静脉注射这些抗生素的患者出现肾功能障碍(31%);接受吸入用抗生素治疗的患者均未发生肾毒性(P≤0.04)。接受吸入用抗生素治疗的患者临床症状完全缓解(81%,静脉用抗生素组为31%;P<0.01)和微生物感染根除(77%,静脉用抗生素组为8%:P<0.0006)的可能性更大。在一项针对皮质类固醇使用情况进行校正的多变量分析中,吸入用抗生素治疗可预测临床症状完全缓解(比值比[OR],6.3;95%置信区间[CI],1.1,37.6;P<0.04)和致病微生物根除(OR 36.7;95%CI,3.3,412.2;P<0.003)。在患有革兰氏阴性VAP的重症癌症患者中,吸入用氨基糖苷类药物耐受性良好,无严重毒性,且可能改善预后。