• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对硫酸气溶胶和雾气缺乏支气管收缩反应。

Lack of bronchoconstrictor response to sulfuric acid aerosols and fogs.

作者信息

Aris R, Christian D, Sheppard D, Balmes J R

机构信息

Lung Biology Center, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California 94143.

出版信息

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Apr;143(4 Pt 1):744-50. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_Pt_1.744.

DOI:10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_Pt_1.744
PMID:2008986
Abstract

Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is the most common acid air pollutant in the United States and is thought to have adverse respiratory effects. Sulfuric acid exists in polluted air as a dissolved solute in both small (haze) and large (fog) particles. Previous work in our laboratory has failed to demonstrate bronchoconstriction after near ambient, large-particle H2SO4 exposure in subjects with asthma. However, other investigators have found slight but significant changes in lung function following inhalation of small-particle or small-particle, low-relative-humidity (RH) H2SO4 aerosols, leading us to hypothesize that particle size and/or RH may be important variables in acid aerosol exposure. We initially studied the effects of resting inhalation of large-particle (volume median diameter, VMD, approximately equal to 6 microns) and small-particle (VMD approximately equal to 0.4 microns) aerosols with an H2SO4 concentration of 3 mg/m3 through a mouthpiece and found no effect on specific airway resistance (SRaw) or symptom scores. In a second mouthpiece study designed to compare high-RH (100%), large-particle (VMD approximately equal to 6 microns) and low-RH (less than 10%), small-particle (VMD approximately equal to 0.3 microns) aerosols with an H2SO4 concentration of 3 mg/m3, we again found no effect of either aerosol. We then examined the effects of small-particle aerosols inhaled in dry air during moderate exercise. Although breathing low-RH air during exercise provoked increases in SRaw in almost all subjects, this could not be attributed to H2SO4 since low-RH saline aerosol produced a similar result.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

硫酸(H₂SO₄)是美国最常见的酸性空气污染物,被认为会对呼吸系统产生不良影响。硫酸在污染空气中以溶解溶质的形式存在于小颗粒(雾霾)和大颗粒(雾)中。我们实验室之前的研究未能证明哮喘患者在接近环境水平、暴露于大颗粒硫酸后会出现支气管收缩。然而,其他研究人员发现,吸入小颗粒或小颗粒、低相对湿度(RH)的硫酸气溶胶后,肺功能会有轻微但显著的变化,这使我们推测颗粒大小和/或相对湿度可能是酸性气溶胶暴露中的重要变量。我们最初通过咬嘴研究了吸入硫酸浓度为3毫克/立方米的大颗粒(体积中值直径,VMD,约等于6微米)和小颗粒(VMD约等于0.4微米)气溶胶的静息效果,发现对特定气道阻力(SRaw)或症状评分没有影响。在第二项咬嘴研究中,旨在比较硫酸浓度为3毫克/立方米的高相对湿度(100%)大颗粒(VMD约等于6微米)和低相对湿度(小于10%)小颗粒(VMD约等于0.3微米)气溶胶,我们再次发现两种气溶胶均无影响。然后我们研究了在适度运动期间吸入干燥空气中的小颗粒气溶胶的效果。尽管几乎所有受试者在运动期间呼吸低相对湿度空气时SRaw都会增加,但这不能归因于硫酸,因为低相对湿度盐雾气溶胶也产生了类似结果。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
Lack of bronchoconstrictor response to sulfuric acid aerosols and fogs.对硫酸气溶胶和雾气缺乏支气管收缩反应。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Apr;143(4 Pt 1):744-50. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_Pt_1.744.
2
Oxidant and acid aerosol exposure in healthy subjects and subjects with asthma. Part II: Effects of sequential sulfuric acid and ozone exposures on the pulmonary function of healthy subjects and subjects with asthma.健康受试者和哮喘患者暴露于氧化剂和酸性气溶胶的情况。第二部分:硫酸和臭氧连续暴露对健康受试者和哮喘患者肺功能的影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 1994 Nov(70):37-93, discussion 95-112.
3
Acid fog-induced bronchoconstriction. The role of hydroxymethanesulfonic acid.酸雾诱发的支气管收缩。羟基甲磺酸的作用。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Mar;141(3):546-51. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.3.546.
4
Effects of prolonged, repeated exposure to ozone, sulfuric acid, and their combination in healthy and asthmatic volunteers.长期、反复接触臭氧、硫酸及其组合对健康和哮喘志愿者的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Aug;150(2):431-40. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.2.8049826.
5
Effects of exposure to sulfuric acid-aerosol on airway responsiveness in guinea pigs: concentration and time dependency.硫酸气溶胶暴露对豚鼠气道反应性的影响:浓度和时间依赖性。
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1993 Jun;39(2):261-72. doi: 10.1080/15287399309531750.
6
Oxidant and acid aerosol exposure in healthy subjects and subjects with asthma. Part I: Effects of oxidants, combined with sulfuric or nitric acid, on the pulmonary function of adolescents with asthma.健康受试者和哮喘患者暴露于氧化剂和酸性气溶胶的情况。第一部分:氧化剂与硫酸或硝酸联合作用对青少年哮喘患者肺功能的影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 1994 Nov(70):1-36.
7
Acidity potentiates bronchoconstriction induced by hypoosmolar aerosols.酸性会增强低渗气雾剂引起的支气管收缩。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Jul;138(1):35-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.1.35.
8
Effect of droplet size on respiratory responses to inhaled sulfuric acid in normal and asthmatic volunteers.液滴大小对正常和哮喘志愿者吸入硫酸后呼吸反应的影响。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Jul;140(1):161-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.1.161.
9
Effect of concentration and cumulative exposure of inhaled sulfuric acid on tracheobronchial particle clearance in healthy humans.吸入硫酸的浓度和累积暴露对健康人气管支气管颗粒清除的影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 1989 Feb;79:167-72. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8979167.
10
Airway responses to sulfate and sulfuric acid aerosols in asthmatics. An exposure-response relationship.哮喘患者气道对硫酸盐和硫酸气溶胶的反应。暴露-反应关系。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Sep;128(3):444-50. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.128.3.444.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of sulphurous air pollutant exposures on symptoms, lung function, exhaled nitric oxide, and nasal epithelial lining fluid antioxidant concentrations in normal and asthmatic adults.正常和哮喘成年人体内,暴露于含硫空气污染物对症状、肺功能、呼出一氧化氮及鼻上皮衬液抗氧化剂浓度的影响。
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Nov;60(11):e15. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.11.e15.
2
Associations between criteria air pollutants and asthma.标准空气污染物与哮喘之间的关联。
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):235-42. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s6235.
3
Respiratory symptoms and ventilatory capacity in workers in a vegetable pickling and mustard production facility.
蔬菜腌制和芥末生产工厂工人的呼吸道症状和通气能力
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;64(6):457-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00517953.
4
Effect of nitrous acid on lung function in asthmatics: a chamber study.亚硝酸对哮喘患者肺功能的影响:一项舱室研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103(4):372-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103372.