Koren H S
Health Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7315, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):235-42. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s6235.
The evidence that asthma is increasing in prevalence is becoming increasingly compelling. This trend has been demonstrated not only in the United States, but also in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia, and several other Western countries. In the United States, the increase is largest in the group under 18 years of age. There is mounting evidence that certain environmental air pollutants are involved in exacerbating asthma. This is based primarily on epidemiologic studies and more recent clinical studies. The U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970 provides special consideration to the class of outdoor air pollutants referred to as criteria pollutants, including O3, sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM), NOx, CO, and Pb. Standards for these pollutants are set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with particular concern for populations at risk. Current evidence suggests that asthmatics are more sensitive to the effects of O3, SO2, PM, and NO2, and are therefore at risk. High SO2 and particulate concentrations have been associated with short-term increases in morbidity and mortality in the general population during dramatic air pollution episodes in the past. Controlled exposure studies have clearly shown that asthmatics are sensitive to low levels of SO2. Exercising asthmatics exposed to SO2 develop bronchoconstriction within minutes, even at levels of 0.25 ppm. Responses are modified by air temperature, humidity, and exercise level. Recent epidemiologic studies have suggested that exposure to PM is strongly associated with morbidity and mortality in the general population and that hospital admissions for bronchitis and asthma were associated with PM10 levels. In controlled clinical studies, asthmatics appear to be no more reactive to aerosols than healthy subjects. Consequently, it is difficult to attribute the increased mortality observed in epidemiologic studies to specific effects demonstrated in controlled human studies. Epidemiologic studies of hospital admissions for asthma have implicated O3 as contributing to the exacerbation of asthma; however, most study designs could not separate the O3 effects from the concomitant effects of acid aerosols and SO2. Controlled human clinical studies have suggested that asthmatics have similar changes in spirometry and airway reactivity in response to O3 exposure compared to healthy adults. However, a possible role of O3 in worsening atopic asthma has recently been suggested in studies combining allergen challenge following exposure to O3. Attempts at identification of factors that predispose asthmatics to responsiveness to NO2 has produced inconsistent results and requires further investigation. In summary, asthmatics have been shown to be a sensitive subpopulation relative to several of the criteria pollutants. Further research linking epidemiologic, clinical, and toxicologic approaches is required to better understand and characterize the risk of exposing asthmatics to these pollutants.
哮喘患病率呈上升趋势的证据越来越有说服力。这一趋势不仅在美国得到证实,在英国、新西兰、澳大利亚以及其他几个西方国家也有体现。在美国,18岁以下人群的增长幅度最大。越来越多的证据表明,某些环境空气污染物会加剧哮喘病情。这主要基于流行病学研究和近期的临床研究。1970年的美国《清洁空气法》对一类被称为标准污染物的室外空气污染物给予了特别关注,包括臭氧(O3)、二氧化硫(SO2)、颗粒物(PM)、氮氧化物(NOx)、一氧化碳(CO)和铅(Pb)。美国环境保护局针对这些污染物制定了标准,尤其关注高危人群。目前的证据表明,哮喘患者对O3、SO2、PM和二氧化氮(NO2)的影响更为敏感,因此处于危险之中。过去在严重空气污染事件期间,高浓度的SO2和颗粒物与普通人群的发病率和死亡率短期上升有关。对照暴露研究清楚地表明,哮喘患者对低水平的SO2敏感。即使在0.25 ppm的水平下,运动中的哮喘患者接触SO2后几分钟内就会出现支气管收缩。反应会受到气温、湿度和运动水平的影响。近期的流行病学研究表明,接触PM与普通人群的发病率和死亡率密切相关,支气管炎和哮喘的住院治疗与PM10水平有关。在对照临床研究中,哮喘患者似乎对气溶胶的反应并不比健康受试者更强烈。因此,很难将流行病学研究中观察到的死亡率增加归因于对照人体研究中所证实的特定影响。关于哮喘住院治疗的流行病学研究表明,O3会加剧哮喘病情;然而,大多数研究设计无法将O3的影响与酸性气溶胶和SO2的伴随影响区分开来。对照人体临床研究表明,与健康成年人相比,哮喘患者在接触O3后,肺功能测定和气道反应性有类似变化。然而,最近在结合O3暴露后进行过敏原激发的研究中,有人提出O3在加重特应性哮喘方面可能发挥作用。确定使哮喘患者易对NO2产生反应的因素的尝试结果并不一致,需要进一步研究。总之,相对于几种标准污染物而言,哮喘患者已被证明是一个敏感的亚人群。需要进一步开展将流行病学、临床和毒理学方法联系起来的研究,以更好地理解和描述哮喘患者接触这些污染物的风险。