Department of Gastroenterology, Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, No. 324 Jing 5 Wei 7 Road, Ji'nan, Shandong, China.
Dig Surg. 2009 Feb;26(6):493-8. doi: 10.1159/000229784. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
To compare the efficiency of pneumatic balloon dilation, botulinum toxin (BT) injection, and the combination of the two modalities in the management of esophageal achalasia.
Ninety patients with esophageal achalasia were randomly divided into three groups according to different interventions, i.e. patients in group A received 100 U BT injection; patients in group B were given balloon dilation, and patients in group C were subjected to balloon dilation plus 100 U BT injection 15 days after the dilation. Clinical assessment and esophageal manometry were performed by experienced gastroenterologists. All patients were followed-up for more than 2 years.
At any time after the treatment, the lower esophageal sphincter pressure and symptom score in group C were lower compared with those in group A or group B (p < 0.05). At 2 years after treatment, the response rate in group C remained 56.67%, still higher than those in the other groups (p < 0.05); the response rate in group B was only 35.71% (10/28); the response rate in group A was 13.79%, the lowest among the three groups.
The efficiency of the combination of 100 U BT administration and small balloon dilation is superior to the single modality approach.
比较气囊扩张、肉毒毒素(BT)注射和两者联合应用在治疗食管失弛缓症中的疗效。
90 例食管失弛缓症患者根据不同干预措施随机分为三组,即 A 组患者接受 100U BT 注射;B 组患者接受气囊扩张;C 组患者在扩张后 15 天接受气囊扩张加 100U BT 注射。由经验丰富的胃肠病学家进行临床评估和食管测压。所有患者均随访超过 2 年。
治疗后任何时间,C 组患者的食管下括约肌压力和症状评分均低于 A 组或 B 组(p<0.05)。治疗 2 年后,C 组的缓解率仍为 56.67%,仍高于其他两组(p<0.05);B 组的缓解率仅为 35.71%(10/28);A 组的缓解率最低,为 13.79%。
100U BT 给药联合小气囊扩张的疗效优于单一治疗方法。