• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对胰腺和其他腹部恶性肿瘤患者疼痛管理的方案驱动阿片类镇痛药、腹腔神经丛阻滞或胸腔镜内脏神经切断术的临床效果的开放性随机比较。

An open randomized comparison of clinical effectiveness of protocol-driven opioid analgesia, celiac plexus block or thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy for pain management in patients with pancreatic and other abdominal malignancies.

机构信息

University Surgical Unit (816), Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Pancreatology. 2009;9(6):755-63. doi: 10.1159/000199441. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1159/000199441
PMID:20090396
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In inoperable malignancy, pain relief with opioids is often inadequate. Nerve block procedures may improve symptom control. Our aim was to assess celiac plexus block (CPB) and thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy (TS) in patients receiving appropriate medical management (MM).

METHODS

Patients with confirmed irresectable malignancy of the pancreas or upper abdominal viscera who required opioid analgesia were randomized to MM alone, MM+CPB, or MM+TS. Randomization was stratified by treatment centre, tumour type and previous opioid medication. The primary endpoint was pain relief at 2 months.

RESULTS

65 patients (58 pancreas cancer) were randomized, 18 withdrew or died within 2 months. Effective pain relief was achieved in only one third of subjects at 2 weeks, and just under half at 2 months (MM: 6/19 and 5/12 evaluable patients; CPB: 5/14 and 5/9; TS 4/14 and 4/11). There were no significant differences between the groups in pain scores or opioid consumption, and there was no correlation between continued use of opioids and effective pain relief.

DISCUSSION

Previous randomized studies have shown small differences in pain scores, but no difference in opioid consumption and quality of life. The absence of any benefit from interventions in the present study questions their value.

摘要

背景

在无法手术的恶性肿瘤中,阿片类药物缓解疼痛往往效果不佳。神经阻滞手术可能会改善症状控制。我们的目的是评估腹腔神经丛阻滞(CPB)和胸腔镜内脏神经切断术(TS)在接受适当药物治疗(MM)的患者中的作用。

方法

对需要阿片类药物镇痛的确诊为不可切除的胰腺或上腹部内脏恶性肿瘤患者进行随机分组,分别接受 MM 单独治疗、MM+CPB 治疗或 MM+TS 治疗。随机分组按治疗中心、肿瘤类型和既往阿片类药物治疗进行分层。主要终点为 2 个月时的疼痛缓解情况。

结果

共 65 例患者(58 例为胰腺癌)接受了随机分组,18 例患者在 2 个月内退出或死亡。2 周时,只有三分之一的患者有效缓解疼痛,2 个月时只有近一半(MM:19 例中有 6 例和 12 例可评估患者;CPB:14 例中有 5 例和 9 例;TS:14 例中有 4 例和 11 例)。各组之间的疼痛评分或阿片类药物消耗量没有显著差异,且继续使用阿片类药物与有效缓解疼痛之间无相关性。

讨论

先前的随机研究显示疼痛评分有微小差异,但阿片类药物消耗量和生活质量没有差异。本研究中干预措施没有任何获益,这对其价值提出了质疑。

相似文献

1
An open randomized comparison of clinical effectiveness of protocol-driven opioid analgesia, celiac plexus block or thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy for pain management in patients with pancreatic and other abdominal malignancies.一项针对胰腺和其他腹部恶性肿瘤患者疼痛管理的方案驱动阿片类镇痛药、腹腔神经丛阻滞或胸腔镜内脏神经切断术的临床效果的开放性随机比较。
Pancreatology. 2009;9(6):755-63. doi: 10.1159/000199441. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
2
A comparison of two invasive techniques in the management of intractable pain due to inoperable pancreatic cancer: neurolytic celiac plexus block and videothoracoscopic splanchnicectomy.两种侵入性技术用于治疗无法手术的胰腺癌所致顽固性疼痛的比较:腹腔神经丛阻滞和电视胸腔镜内脏神经切除术。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Sep;31(7):768-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.03.012.
3
Comparative study between 2 protocols for management of severe pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: one-year follow-up.两种不可切除胰腺癌患者重度疼痛管理方案的对比研究:一年随访。
Clin J Pain. 2013 Sep;29(9):807-13. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182757673.
4
Limited effect of thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy in the treatment of severe chronic pancreatitis pain: a prospective long-term analysis of 75 cases.电视胸腔镜内脏神经切除术治疗重度慢性胰腺炎疼痛的效果有限:75例患者的前瞻性长期分析
Surgery. 2008 Jun;143(6):715-22. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 May 15.
5
Effect of neurolytic celiac plexus block on pain relief, quality of life, and survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔神经丛阻滞对不可切除胰腺癌患者疼痛缓解、生活质量及生存的影响:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2004 Mar 3;291(9):1092-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.9.1092.
6
Efficacy of coeliac plexus and splanchnic nerve blockades in body and tail located pancreatic cancer pain.腹腔神经丛和内脏神经阻滞对胰体尾癌疼痛的疗效。
Eur J Pain. 2004 Dec;8(6):539-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.01.001.
7
Assessment of consecutive neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) technique outcomes in the management of refractory visceral cancer pain.连续腹腔神经丛阻滞(NCPB)技术治疗难治性内脏癌痛的评估。
Pain Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):518-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01332.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
8
Intraoperative celiac plexus block in the surgical palliation for unresectable pancreatic cancer.术中腹腔神经丛阻滞在不可切除胰腺癌手术姑息治疗中的应用
Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999 Aug;25(4):427-31. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0670.
9
[Coeliac plexus block in patients with pancreatic tumour pain].[胰腺肿瘤疼痛患者的腹腔神经丛阻滞]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Apr 1;150(13):723-8.
10
Neurolytic celiac plexus block: a better alternative to opioid treatment in upper abdominal malignancies: an Indian experience.腹腔神经丛阻滞术:上腹部恶性肿瘤中比阿片类药物治疗更好的选择:印度经验
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2005;19(3):15-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Sympathetic nerve blocks for persistent pain in adults with inoperable abdominopelvic cancer.成人无法手术的腹盆腔癌症持续性疼痛的交感神经阻滞。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 6;6(6):CD015229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015229.pub2.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in the Treatment of Chronic Pain Secondary to Oncological Pathology of the Upper Hemiabdomen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔神经丛阻滞术治疗上腹部肿瘤性病变继发慢性疼痛的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Indian J Palliat Care. 2023 Oct-Dec;29(4):394-406. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_203_2022. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Percutaneous splanchnic nerve neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety for cancer-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
经皮内脏神经松解术治疗癌性疼痛的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 6;31(6):324. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07746-y.
4
Celiac plexus neurolysis for abdominal cancers: going beyond pancreatic cancer pain.腹腔神经丛毁损术治疗腹部癌症:超越胰腺癌疼痛
Pain Rep. 2021 May 12;6(1):e930. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000930. eCollection 2021.
5
Pancreas Cancer-Associated Pain Management.胰腺癌相关疼痛的管理
Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):e971-e982. doi: 10.1002/onco.13796. Epub 2021 May 12.
6
Long-Lasting Orthostatic Hypotension and Constipation After Celiac Plexus Block; A Case Report.腹腔神经丛阻滞术后的持续性直立性低血压和便秘;一例报告
Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb 21;8(1):e63221. doi: 10.5812/aapm.63221. eCollection 2018 Feb.
7
Invasive treatment of pain associated with pancreatic cancer on different levels of WHO analgesic ladder.世界卫生组织镇痛阶梯不同级别下胰腺癌相关疼痛的侵入性治疗
BMC Surg. 2016 Apr 18;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0136-3.
8
Splanchnicectomy for pancreatic cancer pain.内脏神经切除术治疗胰腺癌疼痛。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:941726. doi: 10.1155/2014/941726. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
9
Celiac plexus neurolysis in pancreatic cancer: the endoscopic ultrasound approach.胰腺癌腹腔神经丛松解术:内镜超声方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 7;20(1):110-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.110.
10
Pain management in pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌的疼痛管理。
Cancers (Basel). 2010 Dec 24;3(1):43-60. doi: 10.3390/cancers3010043.