Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Clin J Pain. 2013 Sep;29(9):807-13. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182757673.
The efficacy of a celiac plexus block for the treatment of upper abdominal cancer-related pain has been documented. However, the effect of preprocedural pharmacological control of pain on its efficacy remains unknown. The researchers investigated the effect of first controlling severe pain with medications and then performing the celiac plexus block and compared the results with those obtained when the celiac block was performed first followed by pharmacotherapy for controlling severe pain; the impact on and duration of pain relief, effect on the quality of life, and analgesic requirements were analyzed.
Sixty patients with nonresectable pancreatic cancer reporting visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 70 (visceral pain, continuous or intermittent) were randomized into 2 equal groups. Group I comprised patients in whom the celiac block was performed early after the first meeting and then analgesic requirements were managed according to the severity of pain and the World Health Organization analgesic ladder. Group II comprised patients in whom analgesics were first given to control pain and the celiac plexus block was performed only when the patients reported a VAS score < 40. VAS and total daily analgesic consumption were recorded before the block, followed by weekly for 1 month, monthly for 6 months, and finally in the 9th and 12th months. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Patients were asked to report any side effects particularly related to the procedure and intake of opioids.
Pain scores were comparable in both groups at initial assessment. However, in group II, VAS was reduced to 29.2 ± 4.48 in 8 ± 3 days through medical treatment before performing the block. At all time periods examined, pain scores were significantly lower in both groups compared with pretreatment scores (P < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in VAS in group II when compared with group I at 2 months after the procedure and thereafter (P < 0.0001). Morphine sulfate consumption and frequency of opioid adverse effects were significantly lower in group II from the second month onward (P < 0.0001). The number of patients who showed good response to tramadol was significantly higher in group II in the second month until the 6th month (P < 0.05). QLQ-C30 was significantly lower in group II compared with group I from the 2nd month onward (P < 0.0001).
Controlling severe pain with medication and then performing the celiac block seems to be more effective in controlling pain, reducing opioid consumption, and improving the quality of life of patients with pancreatic cancer compared with performing the celiac block at the beginning followed by pharmacotherapy for pain relief.
已有文献证明腹腔神经丛阻滞术治疗上腹部癌相关疼痛的疗效。然而,术前进行药物控制疼痛对其疗效的影响尚不清楚。研究人员调查了先用药物控制严重疼痛,然后再进行腹腔神经丛阻滞术的效果,并将其与先进行腹腔神经丛阻滞术,然后再进行药物治疗控制严重疼痛的结果进行比较;分析了对疼痛缓解的影响和持续时间、对生活质量的影响以及镇痛需求。
60 名患有不可切除的胰腺癌、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分≥70 分(内脏痛,持续或间歇性)的患者被随机分为两组,每组 30 名。第 I 组患者在首次就诊后早期进行腹腔神经丛阻滞术,然后根据疼痛的严重程度和世界卫生组织的镇痛阶梯来管理镇痛需求。第 II 组患者首先给予镇痛药以控制疼痛,只有当患者报告 VAS 评分<40 时才进行腹腔神经丛阻滞术。在阻滞术之前、之后的第 1 周、第 2 个月、第 6 个月、第 9 个月和第 12 个月记录 VAS 和每日总镇痛消耗量。使用生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)评估患者满意度。患者报告了任何特别与手术和阿片类药物摄入相关的副作用。
两组患者在初始评估时疼痛评分相似。然而,在第 II 组中,通过医疗治疗在 8 ± 3 天内将 VAS 降低至 29.2 ± 4.48。在所有检查的时间点,两组患者的疼痛评分均明显低于治疗前的评分(P<0.0001)。与第 I 组相比,第 II 组在手术后 2 个月及以后的 VAS 显著降低(P<0.0001)。从第 2 个月开始,吗啡硫酸盐的消耗和阿片类药物不良反应的频率在第 II 组中显著降低(P<0.0001)。在第 2 个月至第 6 个月期间,第 II 组中对曲马多反应良好的患者数量明显多于第 I 组(P<0.05)。从第 2 个月开始,与第 I 组相比,第 II 组的 QLQ-C30 显著降低(P<0.0001)。
与先进行腹腔神经丛阻滞术,然后再进行药物治疗缓解疼痛相比,先用药物控制严重疼痛,然后再进行腹腔神经丛阻滞术似乎更能有效控制疼痛、减少阿片类药物的消耗并改善胰腺癌患者的生活质量。