• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AAALAC 国际使用绩效标准评估欧洲机构的伦理审查。

The use of performance standards by AAALAC International to evaluate ethical review in European institutions.

机构信息

AAALAC International, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

Lab Anim (NY). 2010 Feb;39(2):49-53. doi: 10.1038/laban0210-49.

DOI:10.1038/laban0210-49
PMID:20090695
Abstract

During the past several decades, society has become increasingly concerned about the welfare of animals used in research. Today, the public asks scientists to justify the use of research animals and to be accountable for their welfare. Research institutions, government bodies and other regulatory authorities have developed mechanisms to ensure that researchers follow the principles of the 3Rs and use and care for research animals in an ethical manner. Additionally, organizations such as the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC International) have developed voluntary programs that can help researchers to ensure that they are caring for research animals appropriately. The author discusses how AAALAC International uses performance standards to evaluate the ethical review processes of European institutions.

摘要

在过去的几十年中,社会对用于研究的动物的福利越来越关注。如今,公众要求科学家证明研究动物的使用是合理的,并对其福利负责。研究机构、政府机构和其他监管机构已经制定了机制,以确保研究人员遵循 3R 原则,并以合乎道德的方式使用和照顾研究动物。此外,像国际实验动物评估和认证协会(AAALAC International)这样的组织制定了自愿性计划,可以帮助研究人员确保他们正在适当地照顾研究动物。作者讨论了 AAALAC International 如何使用绩效标准来评估欧洲机构的伦理审查过程。

相似文献

1
The use of performance standards by AAALAC International to evaluate ethical review in European institutions.AAALAC 国际使用绩效标准评估欧洲机构的伦理审查。
Lab Anim (NY). 2010 Feb;39(2):49-53. doi: 10.1038/laban0210-49.
2
The evolution and adoption of standards used by AAALAC.实验动物评估与认可协会(AAALAC)所采用标准的演变与应用。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 May;51(3):293-7.
3
Does accreditation by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC) ensure greater compliance with animal welfare laws?国际实验动物评估和认可委员会(AAALAC)的认可是否能确保更好地遵守动物福利法?
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2015;18(1):82-91. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2014.948625. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
4
A tool for semiannual review of the institutional animal care and use program.机构动物护理与使用计划半年审查工具。
Lab Anim (NY). 2007 Oct;36(9):36-40. doi: 10.1038/laban1007-36.
5
Protocol audits for post-approval monitoring of animal use protocols.用于动物使用方案批准后监测的方案审核。
Lab Anim (NY). 2005 Nov;34(10):23-7. doi: 10.1038/laban1105-23.
6
Review of the third edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching.《科研与教学中农业动物饲养与使用指南》第三版述评
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 May;51(3):298-300.
7
Defining the Animal Care and Use Program.界定动物护理与使用计划。
Lab Anim (NY). 2005 Nov;34(10):41-4. doi: 10.1038/laban1105-41.
8
FELASA guidelines for the accreditation of health monitoring programs and testing laboratories involved in health monitoring.FELASA 关于健康监测计划和参与健康监测的检测实验室认证的指南。
Lab Anim (NY). 2010 Feb;39(2):43-8. doi: 10.1038/laban0210-43.
9
Uncovering the cause of a research problem. A word from AAALAC International.
Lab Anim (NY). 2009 Sep;38(9):286. doi: 10.1038/laban0909-286b.
10
Animal welfare: a complex domestic and international public-policy issue--who are the key players?动物福利:一个复杂的国内和国际公共政策问题——关键参与者有哪些?
J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Spring;37(1):3-12. doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.1.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Sanhua Tang protects against ischemic stroke by preventing blood-brain barrier injury: a network pharmacology and experiments.三花汤通过预防血脑屏障损伤防治缺血性脑卒中:网络药理学与实验研究。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2024 Aug;44(4):794-803. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20240515.001.
2
Introduction to the EQIPD quality system.EQIPD 质量体系简介。
Elife. 2021 May 24;10:e63294. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63294.