急性胰腺炎的肠内营养与肠外营养

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis.

作者信息

Al-Omran Mohammed, Albalawi Zaina H, Tashkandi Mariam F, Al-Ansary Lubna A

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Peripheral Vascular Disease Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O.Box 7805(37), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11472.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD002837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002837.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis creates a catabolic stress state promoting a systemic inflammatory response and nutritional deterioration. Adequate supply of nutrients plays an important role in recovery. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has been standard practice for providing exogenous nutrients to patients with severe acute pancreatitis. However, recent data suggest that enteral nutrition (EN) is not only feasible, but safer and more effective.Therefore, we sought to update our systematic review to re-evaluate the level of evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of TPN versus EN on mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients with acute pancreatitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by computerized searches of The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Additional studies were identified by searching Scisearch, bibliographies of review articles and identified trials. The search was undertaken in August 2000 and updated in September 2002, October 2003, November 2004 and November 2008. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized clinical trials comparing TPN to EN in patients with acute pancreatitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed trial quality. A standardized form was used to extract relevant data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials with a total of 348 participants were included. Comparing EN to TPN for acute pancreatitis, the relative risk (RR) for death was 0.50 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.91), for multiple organ failure (MOF) was 0.55 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.81), for systemic infection was 0.39 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.65), for operative interventions was 0.44 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.67), for local septic complications was 0.74 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.35), and for other local complications was 0.70 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.13). Mean length of hospital stay was reduced by 2.37 days in EN vs TPN groups (95% CI -7.18 to 2.44). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis for EN vs TPN in patients with severe acute pancreatitis showed a RR for death of 0.18 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.58) and a RR for MOF of 0.46 (95% CI 0.16 to 1.29).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute pancreatitis, enteral nutrition significantly reduced mortality, multiple organ failure, systemic infections, and the need for operative interventions compared to those who received TPN. In addition, there was a trend towards a reduction in length of hospital stay. These data suggest that EN should be considered the standard of care for patients with acute pancreatitis requiring nutritional support.

摘要

背景

急性胰腺炎会引发分解代谢应激状态,促进全身炎症反应和营养状况恶化。充足的营养供应对康复起着重要作用。全肠外营养(TPN)一直是为重症急性胰腺炎患者提供外源性营养的标准做法。然而,近期数据表明肠内营养(EN)不仅可行,而且更安全、更有效。因此,我们试图更新系统评价以重新评估证据水平。

目的

比较TPN与EN对急性胰腺炎患者死亡率、发病率及住院时间的影响。

检索策略

通过计算机检索Cochrane对照试验注册库、MEDLINE和EMBASE来识别试验。通过检索Scisearch、综述文章的参考文献及已识别的试验来识别其他研究。检索于2000年8月进行,并在2002年9月、2003年10月、2004年11月和2008年11月更新。未设语言限制。

入选标准

比较急性胰腺炎患者TPN与EN的随机临床试验。

数据收集与分析

两名评价员独立提取数据并评估试验质量。使用标准化表格提取相关数据。

主要结果

纳入了8项试验,共348名参与者。比较急性胰腺炎患者的EN与TPN,死亡的相对风险(RR)为0.50(95%CI 0.28至0.91),多器官功能衰竭(MOF)的RR为0.55(95%CI 0.37至0.81),全身感染的RR为0.39(95%CI 0.23至0.65),手术干预的RR为0.44(95%CI 0.29至0.67),局部感染并发症的RR为0.74(95%CI 0.40至1.35),其他局部并发症的RR为0.70(95%CI 0.43至1.13)。与TPN组相比,EN组的平均住院时间缩短了2.37天(95%CI -7.18至2.44)。此外,对重症急性胰腺炎患者的EN与TPN进行亚组分析显示,死亡RR为0.18(95%CI 0.06至0.58),MOF的RR为0.46(95%CI 0.16至1.29)。

作者结论

与接受TPN的患者相比,急性胰腺炎患者接受肠内营养可显著降低死亡率、多器官功能衰竭、全身感染及手术干预需求。此外,住院时间有缩短趋势。这些数据表明,对于需要营养支持的急性胰腺炎患者,EN应被视为护理标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索