Goldsmiths' College.
Br J Sociol. 2010 Jan;61 Suppl 1:271-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01247.x.
This paper sets out an approach to the analysis of political power in terms of problematics of government. It argues against an overvaluation of the 'problem of the State' in political debate and social theory. A number of conceptual tools are suggested for the analysis of the many and varied alliances between political and other authorities that seek to govern economic activity, social life and individual conduct. Modern political rationalities and governmental technologies are shown to be intrinsically linked to developments in knowledge and to the powers of expertise. The characteristics of liberal problematics of government are investigated, and it is argued that they are dependent upon technologies for 'governing at a distance', seeking to create locales, entities and persons able to operate a regulated autonomy. The analysis is exemplified through an investigation of welfarism as a mode of 'social' government. The paper concludes with a brief consideration of neo-liberalism which demonstrates that the analytical language structured by the philosophical opposition of state and civil society is unable to comprehend contemporary transformations in modes of exercise of political power.(1).
本文旨在探讨以政府问题为导向的政治权力分析方法。文中反对在政治辩论和社会理论中对“国家问题”的过分重视。本文还提出了一系列概念工具,用于分析各种寻求治理经济活动、社会生活和个人行为的政治权威和其他权威之间的多种联盟。本文表明,现代政治理性和政府技术与知识的发展以及专业权力内在联系在一起。本文还探讨了自由政府问题的特点,并认为它们依赖于“远程治理”技术,试图创造能够进行规范自治的场所、实体和个人。本文通过对福利主义作为一种“社会”治理模式的调查为例进行了分析。本文最后简要考虑了新自由主义,表明由国家和公民社会哲学对立所构建的分析语言无法理解当代政治权力行使模式的转变。