Leclerc B-S, Bégin C, Cadieux E, Goulet L, Allaire J-F, Meloche J, Leduc N, Kergoat M-J
Service de surveillance, recherche et évaluation, direction de santé publique et d'évaluation, agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Lanaudière, 245, rue du Curé-Majeau, Joliette, QC, J6E 8S8 Canada.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2010 Feb;58(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2009.10.008. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
Evidence linking home hazards to falls has not been well established. The evidence-based approach to fall-risk assessment in longitudinal studies becomes difficult because of exposures that change during follow-up. We conducted a cohort study to determine the prevalence of hazards and to resolve whether they are linked to the risk of falls among 959 seniors receiving home-care services.
A home hazards assessment was completed at entry and every six months thereafter using a standardized form. The adjusted (for a number of confounding factors) relationship between home hazards and falls was estimated using a survival model taking into account updated time-varying exposures and multiple events. Falls leading to a medical consultation were examined as a secondary outcome, hypothesized as a measure of severity.
Home environmental hazards were found in 91% of homes, with a mean of 3.3 risks per individual. The bathroom was the most common place for hazards. The presence of hazards was significantly associated with all falls and fall-related medical consultations, and showed relatively constant effects from one fall to another.
The current study is innovative in its approach and useful in its contribution to the understanding of the interaction between home environmental hazards and falls. Our results indicate that inattention to changes in exposure masks the statistical association between home hazards and falls. Each environmental hazard identified in the home increases the risk of falling by about 19%. These findings support the positive findings of trials that demonstrate the effectiveness of this home hazard reduction program, particularly for at-risk people.
家庭危险因素与跌倒之间的关联尚未得到充分证实。由于在随访期间暴露因素会发生变化,纵向研究中基于证据的跌倒风险评估方法变得困难。我们开展了一项队列研究,以确定959名接受居家护理服务的老年人中危险因素的患病率,并确定这些因素是否与跌倒风险相关。
在入组时及此后每六个月使用标准化表格完成一次家庭危险因素评估。使用生存模型估计家庭危险因素与跌倒之间的调整后(针对一些混杂因素)关系,该模型考虑了更新的随时间变化的暴露因素和多个事件。将导致就医的跌倒作为次要结局进行研究,假设其为严重程度的一种衡量指标。
91%的家庭存在家庭环境危险因素,平均每人有3.3个危险因素。浴室是最常见的危险因素所在场所。危险因素的存在与所有跌倒及与跌倒相关的就医显著相关,并且从一次跌倒到另一次跌倒显示出相对稳定的影响。
本研究在方法上具有创新性,有助于理解家庭环境危险因素与跌倒之间的相互作用。我们的结果表明,对暴露变化的忽视掩盖了家庭危险因素与跌倒之间的统计学关联。家中识别出的每一种环境危险因素会使跌倒风险增加约19%。这些发现支持了试验的积极结果,这些试验证明了该家庭危险因素减少计划的有效性,特别是对高危人群。