The African Child Policy Forum, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Jan;34(1):34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.08.007. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) is generally viewed from an ethical perspective, specifically for its influence and impact on our ethos and the place of children in society. A recent ground-breaking report prepared by The African Child Policy Forum (ACPF) shows conceptually and empirically how the CRC can be used as a tool for planning national action and for monitoring government performance and compliance. This paper reports on the methodology followed, the philosophical and legal foundations, the results of the application and the policy lessons.
This work is based on a methodology, the Child-Friendliness Index (CFI), developed by ACPF to analyse and monitor the performance of all 52 African governments. The index is inspired by the CRC's three core principles-Protection, Provision and Participation-and based on over forty policy and child-outcome indicators.
The methodology was applied to organise data, assess performance and score and rank all 52 African governments at a point in time and over time. On this basis, the study identifies which governments are child-friendly and which ones are not and why, and what it is that poorly performing governments can do to comply with their international obligations.
Two important conclusions emerge from this exercise. The first is the beauty and power of simplicity. Much analysis of government obligations is hampered by the tedious task of having to scan voluminous information and bulky reports. But this CRC-inspired and CRC-based methodology provides a simple but powerful, transparent and objective framework for policy analysis and comparison. Secondly, the African experience confirms that three things matter on the policy front: politics that put children at the centre of public policy; Laws that protect them; and Budgets that provide for their basic needs and full development.
ACPF's work provides an approach that governments, advocacy groups and treaty bodies can use to monitor government compliance, to identify areas for progress and to formulate effective pro-children policies. The approach is important and relevant for other regions of the world as it is for Africa.
《儿童权利公约》(CRC)通常从伦理角度来看待,特别是其对我们的道德和儿童在社会中的地位的影响。最近,非洲儿童政策论坛(ACPF)编写了一份具有开创性的报告,从概念和经验上展示了 CRC 如何可作为规划国家行动以及监测政府绩效和合规的工具。本文报告了所遵循的方法、哲学和法律基础、应用结果和政策经验。
这项工作基于 ACPF 开发的一种方法,即儿童友好指数(CFI),用于分析和监测所有 52 个非洲政府的绩效。该指数的灵感来自 CRC 的三个核心原则——保护、提供和参与——并基于 40 多个政策和儿童成果指标。
该方法用于组织数据、评估绩效、评分和排名,以及在特定时间点和随时间推移对所有 52 个非洲政府进行排名。在此基础上,该研究确定了哪些政府是儿童友好型政府,哪些不是,以及为什么,以及表现不佳的政府可以做些什么来履行其国际义务。
从这项工作中得出两个重要结论。第一个是简单的美丽和力量。对政府义务进行大量分析受到必须扫描大量信息和庞大报告的乏味任务的阻碍。但是,这种受 CRC 启发并基于 CRC 的方法为政策分析和比较提供了一个简单但强大、透明和客观的框架。其次,非洲的经验证实,政策方面有三件事很重要:将儿童置于公共政策中心的政治;保护他们的法律;以及为他们的基本需求和全面发展提供资金的预算。
ACPF 的工作提供了一种方法,政府、倡导团体和条约机构可以用来监测政府的合规性,确定需要改进的领域,并制定有效的有利于儿童的政策。这种方法对世界其他地区和非洲一样重要和相关。