Child Rights and Protection Consultancy-International, 1040 Wintergreen Terrace, Batavia, IL 60510, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Jan;34(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.010. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
(1) To identify which United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) recommended child protection (CP) measures, such as policy, reporting systems, and services for child abuse and neglect (CAN) victims, individually or in combination, were most important in establishing a basic level of child protection in 42 countries; and (2) to assess whether these measures were necessary or sufficient to achieve basic child protection in developing and industrialized countries.
Child protection and/or rights expert respondents from 42 countries completed a questionnaire on CRC Article 19 (CRC19) required CP measures implementation and rated their country's effectiveness in implementation, the current level of effectiveness of child protection, and the relevance of improvements in child protection since the CRC was adopted in 1989. Information from the Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding Observations, as well as UNICEF and WHO indicators on child health and protection issues were used to check and supplement responses. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was used to identify child protection measure implementation effectiveness.
Results indicate that child protection judged as comparatively more successful among study countries is a result of having the following measures in place from two types of social programs: a CP infrastructure (legislation plus services) and at least one information-based intervention support program.
Fourteen (33%) countries were determined to have established at least a basic CP system toward protection of children from violence and maltreatment. These countries reported having the three required elements described above. The study reinforces the need for governments to take a systems approach to child protection, including policy/legislation, information-based programs and social services, as well as professional training and public awareness raising. The top-ranked countries included: Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Jordan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom.
Governments need to establish CP systems with multiple, well-integrated, effective CP measures as elaborated above, working with trained professionals and also raising public awareness to ensure successful protection for all children in every country. Partial measures are not effective. Further, in addition to establishing, implementing, and evaluating the effectiveness of professional interventions, the actual outcomes for children, not studied or reported on here, need to be the priority focus for child protection going forward.
(1) 确定《联合国儿童权利公约》(CRC) 建议的哪些儿童保护 (CP) 措施,如政策、报告系统和儿童虐待和忽视 (CAN) 受害者服务,单独或组合使用,对于在 42 个国家建立基本的儿童保护水平最为重要;(2) 评估这些措施对于发展中国家和工业化国家实现基本儿童保护是否必要或充分。
42 个国家的儿童保护和/或权利专家受访者完成了一份关于 CRC 第 19 条 (CRC19) 规定的 CP 措施实施情况的问卷,并对本国实施情况的有效性、当前儿童保护的有效性水平以及自 1989 年通过 CRC 以来儿童保护的改进的相关性进行了评分。委员会关于儿童权利的结论意见、儿童健康和保护问题的儿童基金会和世界卫生组织指标的信息被用来检查和补充答复。定性比较分析 (QCA) 用于确定儿童保护措施实施的有效性。
研究结果表明,在所研究的国家中,被认为相对更成功的儿童保护是以下两种社会方案的结果:一个 CP 基础设施(立法加服务)和至少一个基于信息的干预支持方案。
确定有 14 个(33%)国家至少建立了一个基本的 CP 系统,以保护儿童免受暴力和虐待。这些国家报告说,有上述三个必要的要素。该研究强调,政府需要采取系统的方法来保护儿童,包括政策/立法、基于信息的方案和社会服务,以及专业培训和提高公众意识。排名最高的国家包括:澳大利亚、巴林、比利时、巴西、加拿大、爱沙尼亚、德国、意大利、约旦、黎巴嫩、马来西亚、大韩民国、俄罗斯联邦和联合王国。
各国政府需要建立 CP 系统,该系统应包含上述多种、综合、有效的 CP 措施,并与训练有素的专业人员合作,同时提高公众意识,以确保每个国家的所有儿童都能得到成功的保护。部分措施是无效的。此外,除了建立、实施和评估专业干预措施的有效性外,儿童保护的重点还需要放在儿童的实际结果上,而这些结果在这里没有进行研究或报告。