Suppr超能文献

图书馆员专业继续教育教学模式偏好。

Librarian instruction-delivery modality preferences for professional continuing education.

机构信息

The George T. Harrell Health Sciences Library, Penn State Hershey, College of Medicine, H127, 500 University Drive P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jan;98(1):57-64. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Attending professional continuing education (CE) is an important component of librarianship. This research study identified librarians' preferences in delivery modalities of instruction for professional CE. The study also identified influential factors associated with attending CE classes.

METHODS

Five instruction-delivery modalities and six influential factors were identified for inclusion in an online survey. The survey completed by members of the American Library Association (ALA), Special Libraries Association (SLA), and Medical Library Association (MLA) provided the data for analysis of librarian preferences and influential factors.

RESULTS

The majority of respondents were MLA members, followed by ALA and SLA members. Librarians from all three library associations preferred the face-to-face instructional modality. The most influential factor associated with the decision to attend a professional CE class was cost.

CONCLUSIONS

All five instruction-delivery modalities present useful structures for imparting professional CE. As librarians' experience with different modalities increases and as technology improves, preferences in instruction delivery may shift. But at present, face-to-face remains the most preferred modality. Based on the results of this study, cost was the most influential factor associated with attending a CE class. This may change as additional influential factors are identified and analyzed in future studies.

摘要

目的

参加专业继续教育(CE)是图书馆学的一个重要组成部分。本研究旨在确定图书馆员对专业 CE 教学模式的偏好。该研究还确定了与参加 CE 课程相关的影响因素。

方法

确定了 5 种教学模式和 6 种影响因素,纳入在线调查。该调查由美国图书馆协会(ALA)、特殊图书馆协会(SLA)和医学图书馆协会(MLA)的成员完成,为分析图书馆员的偏好和影响因素提供了数据。

结果

大多数受访者是 MLA 会员,其次是 ALA 和 SLA 会员。来自这三个图书馆协会的图书馆员都更喜欢面对面的教学模式。与参加专业 CE 课程的决定最相关的最主要影响因素是成本。

结论

所有 5 种教学模式都为传授专业 CE 提供了有用的结构。随着图书馆员对不同模式的经验增加和技术的提高,教学模式的偏好可能会发生变化。但目前,面对面仍然是最受欢迎的模式。基于这项研究的结果,成本是与参加 CE 课程最相关的最主要影响因素。随着未来研究中确定和分析更多的影响因素,这一情况可能会发生变化。

相似文献

8
Training needs of medical librarians in Nigeria: A survey.尼日利亚医学图书馆员的培训需求:一项调查。
Health Info Libr J. 2022 Jun;39(2):155-165. doi: 10.1111/hir.12383. Epub 2021 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Barriers to innovation in continuing medical education.继续医学教育中的创新障碍。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Summer;28(3):148-56. doi: 10.1002/chp.176.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验