• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新信息的累积引入与快速引入

Cumulative versus rapid introduction of new information.

作者信息

Gleason M, Carnine D, Vala N

机构信息

University of Oregon.

出版信息

Except Child. 1991 Feb;57(4):353-8.

PMID:2009905
Abstract

This study investigated the way new information is presented to students. Subjects were 60 elementary and middle school students, most with learning disabilities. Students used two versions of a specially designed computer-assisted instruction (CAI) program. One version rapidly presented students with seven pieces of information (rapid-introduction group); the other cumulatively presented smaller "chunks" of information (cumulative-introduction group). Both groups worked to mastery level successfully but students in the cumulative group spent one-third the time, required fewer responses, showed less frustration, and made fewer errors in the process. Results suggest that students with learning disabilities need much more practice than most commercial CAI programs supply.

摘要

本研究调查了向学生呈现新信息的方式。研究对象是60名中小学生,其中大多数有学习障碍。学生们使用了两个版本的专门设计的计算机辅助教学(CAI)程序。一个版本迅速向学生呈现七条信息(快速引入组);另一个版本则累积呈现较小的信息“块”(累积引入组)。两组学生都成功达到了掌握水平,但累积组的学生花费的时间仅为三分之一,所需的回应更少,表现出的挫败感更少,并且在此过程中犯的错误也更少。结果表明,有学习障碍的学生比大多数商业CAI程序所提供的练习要多得多。

相似文献

1
Cumulative versus rapid introduction of new information.新信息的累积引入与快速引入
Except Child. 1991 Feb;57(4):353-8.
2
[The application of new technologies to solving maths problems for students with learning disabilities: the 'underwater school'].[新技术在帮助学习障碍学生解决数学问题中的应用:“水下学校”]
Rev Neurol. 2008;46 Suppl 1:S59-63.
3
Use of assisted reading to increase correct reading rates and decrease error rates of students with learning disabilities.使用辅助阅读来提高学习障碍学生的正确阅读率并降低错误率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):255-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-255.
4
Academic outcomes for students with learning disabilities in consultation and resource programs.参与咨询和资源项目的学习障碍学生的学业成果。
Except Child. 1990 Oct-Nov;57(2):162-72.
5
Computer-assisted instruction improves clinical reasoning skills of dietetics students.计算机辅助教学可提高营养学专业学生的临床推理能力。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Aug;95(8):868-73. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00241-3.
6
Mainstream Experiences for Learning Disabled students (Project MELD): preliminary report.学习障碍学生的主流学习体验(MELD项目):初步报告。
Except Child. 1990 Oct-Nov;57(2):176-85.
7
Relevance of neuroscience to effective education for students with reading and other learning disabilities.神经科学与针对阅读及其他学习障碍学生的有效教育的相关性。
J Child Neurol. 2004 Oct;19(10):840-5.
8
Does computer-assisted instruction really help to improve the learning process?计算机辅助教学真的有助于改善学习过程吗?
Med Educ. 2001 Oct;35(10):983-9.
9
Instructional and curricular requisites of mainstreamed students with learning disabilities.有学习障碍的随班就读学生的教学与课程要求。
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Jun-Jul;24(6):354-60, 353. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400604.
10
From research to policy to practice: prescription for success for students with learning disabilities.从研究到政策再到实践:学习障碍学生的成功秘诀
J Child Neurol. 2004 Oct;19(10):836-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evidence is in the Design.证据就在设计之中。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 Sep 3;44(2-3):195-223. doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00309-8. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving.累积练习对数学问题解决的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Summer;35(2):105-23. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-105.