Suppr超能文献

计算机辅助教学可提高营养学专业学生的临床推理能力。

Computer-assisted instruction improves clinical reasoning skills of dietetics students.

作者信息

Raidl M A, Wood O B, Lehman J D, Evers W D

机构信息

Department of Applied Human Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Aug;95(8):868-73. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00241-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The effects of a computer-assisted instruction (CAI) tutorial program on learning clinical reasoning skills were compared in undergraduate dietetics students.

DESIGN

A drill-and-practice program to control for time on task, and tutorial program, and a simulation program, as the test vehicle, were developed. The tutorial and simulation programs presented data on a patient with cardiovascular disease.

SETTING

Subjects were tested in 30 undergraduate dietetics programs.

SUBJECTS

Participants were 413 undergraduate diet therapy students enrolled in a coordinated program in dietetics (CPD) or a didactic program in dietetics (DPD).

INTERVENTION

After completion of lectures on cardiovascular disease, subjects were given the drill-and-practice program plus a simulation test (group 1), the tutorial plus a simulation test (group 2), or the simulation test only (group 3).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Scores on the simulation test were compared. Variables included type of CAI, dietetics program, year in school, computer experience, and experience using a medical chart. Mastery of objectives related to lower- and higher-level clinical reasoning skills introduced in the tutorial program was computed.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

One-way analysis of variance and Student-Newman Keuls tests were conducted to determine any differences among the three groups. Reliability was determined using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20.

RESULTS

The reliability coefficient of the stimulation test was 0.93. Group 2 higher on the simulation test than group 1 or group 3. As a group, the CPD students scored higher than the DPD students. When CPD and DPD students were divided into the three experimental groups, there was no significant difference between the CPD and DPD student simulation scores. Group 2 mastered all objectives for lower-level reasoning skills and the higher-level decision-making objective better than groups 1 and 3.

APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: A computer tutorial program enhanced clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate dietetics students. This type of program could be used to supplement many topics taught in diet therapy and provide DPD students with experimental learning before their clinical intern practicums.

摘要

目的

比较计算机辅助教学(CAI)辅导程序对本科营养学学生临床推理技能学习的影响。

设计

开发了一个用于控制任务时间的练习程序、一个辅导程序以及作为测试工具的模拟程序。辅导程序和模拟程序展示了一名心血管疾病患者的数据。

设置

在30个本科营养学项目中对受试者进行测试。

受试者

参与者为413名本科饮食治疗专业学生,他们参加了营养学协调项目(CPD)或营养学讲授课程项目(DPD)。

干预

在完成心血管疾病讲座后,受试者被给予练习程序加模拟测试(第1组)、辅导程序加模拟测试(第2组)或仅模拟测试(第3组)。

主要观察指标

比较模拟测试的分数。变量包括CAI类型、营养学项目、在校年级、计算机使用经验以及使用病历的经验。计算对辅导程序中引入的与低级和高级临床推理技能相关目标的掌握情况。

统计分析

进行单因素方差分析和Student-Newman Keuls检验以确定三组之间的任何差异。使用库德-理查森公式20确定信度。

结果

模拟测试的信度系数为0.93。第2组在模拟测试中的得分高于第1组或第3组。总体而言,CPD学生的得分高于DPD学生。当CPD和DPD学生被分为三个实验组时,CPD和DPD学生的模拟分数之间没有显著差异。第2组比第1组和第3组更好地掌握了所有低级推理技能目标和高级决策目标。

应用/结论:计算机辅导程序提高了本科营养学学生的临床推理技能。这种类型的程序可用于补充饮食治疗中讲授的许多主题,并在DPD学生临床实习前为他们提供实验性学习。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验