Palmberg Paul, Kim Elizabeth E, Kwok Kenneth K, Tressler Charles S
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida 33136, USA.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul-Aug;20(4):708-18. doi: 10.1177/112067211002000411.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed combination latanoprost/timolol versus latanoprost or timolol monotherapy.
This 12-week, randomized, double-masked study was designed to overcome potential shortcomings of previous trials. We enrolled 788 subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension treated with a beta-blocker for > or = 4 weeks before screening. After washout, 500 subjects with a baseline mean intraocular pressure (IOP) > or = 26 and < 37 mmHg were randomized to fixed combination latanoprost-timolol in the evening (n = 170), latanoprost monotherapy in the evening (n = 165), or timolol monotherapy in the morning (n = 165). At weeks 2, 6, and 12, each subject's IOP level was measured in triplicate at 8 AM (predose), 10 AM, and 4 PM in each eye. Adverse events were monitored throughout. The statistical superiority of the fixed combination for the 18 pairwise comparisons with the 2 monotherapies was evaluated (analysis of variance). RESULTS. The statistical superiority of the fixed combination was demonstrated at 7/9 time points versus latanoprost and 9/9 time points versus timolol. Mean diurnal IOP levels were similar at baseline but significantly lower with the fixed combination than with either monotherapy at weeks 6 and 12 (each p < 0.05). Patients treated with the fixed combination were significantly more likely than those treated with either monotherapy to reach prespecified percent IOP reductions at the upper thresholds and to achieve very low target diurnal IOP levels. All therapies were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS. Fixed combination latanoprost/timolol safely reduces IOP levels in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, though only slightly more than does latanoprost monotherapy.
评估拉坦前列素/噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂与拉坦前列素或噻吗洛尔单药治疗相比的疗效和安全性。
这项为期12周的随机双盲研究旨在克服既往试验的潜在缺陷。我们纳入了788例开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者,这些患者在筛查前接受β受体阻滞剂治疗≥4周。洗脱期后,500例基线平均眼压(IOP)≥26且<37 mmHg的患者被随机分为晚上使用拉坦前列素-噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂组(n = 170)、晚上使用拉坦前列素单药治疗组(n = 165)或早上使用噻吗洛尔单药治疗组(n = 165)。在第2、6和12周,于上午8点(给药前)、10点和下午4点对每只眼睛的IOP水平进行三次测量。全程监测不良事件。评估固定复方制剂与两种单药治疗进行18次成对比较的统计学优势(方差分析)。结果。固定复方制剂在7/9个时间点相对于拉坦前列素以及在9/9个时间点相对于噻吗洛尔显示出统计学优势。基线时平均昼夜IOP水平相似,但在第6周和第12周,固定复方制剂组的IOP水平显著低于单药治疗组(各p < 0.05)。与单药治疗组相比,使用固定复方制剂治疗的患者在较高阈值下达到预先设定的IOP降低百分比并实现极低目标昼夜IOP水平的可能性显著更高。所有治疗的耐受性均良好。结论。拉坦前列素/噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂可安全降低青光眼或高眼压症患者的IOP水平,尽管仅比拉坦前列素单药治疗略多。