• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两种不同抗菌中央静脉导管的抗菌活性持续时间。

Comparison of the duration of antimicrobial activity of 2 different antimicrobial central venous catheters.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;31(3):295-7. doi: 10.1086/650757.

DOI:10.1086/650757
PMID:20100086
Abstract

We compared the duration of antimicrobial effectiveness of 2 different antimicrobial catheters. The baseline activity of minocycline-rifampin catheters was greater than that of silver-platinum-carbon catheters against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecalis. The antimicrobial activity of the minocycline-rifampin catheters against these pathogens persisted for up to 12 days, while that of the silver-platinum-carbon catheters was depleted by day 10 (P < .05).

摘要

我们比较了两种不同抗菌导管的抗菌效果持续时间。与银-铂-碳导管相比，米诺环素-利福平导管对金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌的基础活性更强。米诺环素-利福平导管对这些病原体的抗菌活性可持续长达 12 天，而银-铂-碳导管的抗菌活性在第 10 天耗尽（P <.05）。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the duration of antimicrobial activity of 2 different antimicrobial central venous catheters.比较两种不同抗菌中央静脉导管的抗菌活性持续时间。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;31(3):295-7. doi: 10.1086/650757.
2
The broad-spectrum activity and efficacy of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin.涂有米诺环素和利福平的导管的广谱活性和疗效。
J Infect Dis. 1996 Feb;173(2):418-24. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.2.418.
3
In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity of three different central venous catheters against gram-positive bacteria.三种不同中心静脉导管对革兰氏阳性菌抗菌活性的体外评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 May;21(5):379-84. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0719-z. Epub 2002 May 14.
4
A prospective, randomized trial of rifampicin-minocycline-coated and silver-platinum-carbon-impregnated central venous catheters.一项关于利福平-米诺环素涂层及银-铂-碳浸渍中心静脉导管的前瞻性随机试验。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):668-75. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201404.05523.34.
5
Comparative in vitro efficacies and antimicrobial durabilities of novel antimicrobial central venous catheters.新型抗菌中心静脉导管的体外疗效及抗菌耐久性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Oct;50(10):3283-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01622-05.
6
In vitro exposure of bacteria to antimicrobial impregnated-central venous catheters does not directly lead to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.细菌在体外暴露于抗菌药物浸渍的中心静脉导管不会直接导致抗菌药物耐药性的出现。
Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1628-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1628.
7
Improved antibiotic-impregnated catheters with extended-spectrum activity against resistant bacteria and fungi.具有广谱抗耐药菌和真菌活性的改良抗生素浸渍导管。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Feb;56(2):935-41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05836-11. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
8
Antimicrobial durability and rare ultrastructural colonization of indwelling central catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin.涂有米诺环素和利福平的留置中心静脉导管的抗菌耐久性及罕见的超微结构定植情况
Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;26(2):219-24. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00015.
9
Which antimicrobial impregnated central venous catheter should we use? Modeling the costs and outcomes of antimicrobial catheter use.我们应该使用哪种抗菌浸渍中心静脉导管？对抗菌导管使用的成本和结果进行建模。
Am J Infect Control. 2003 Feb;31(1):1-8. doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.35.
10
Prolonged bacterial exposure to minocycline/rifampicin-impregnated vascular catheters does not affect antimicrobial activity of catheters.细菌长期接触米诺环素/利福平浸渍的血管导管不会影响导管的抗菌活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Jul;60(1):148-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm173. Epub 2007 May 24.