Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Br J Nutr. 2009 Dec;102 Suppl 1:S56-63. doi: 10.1017/S000711450999314X.
In order to assess nutritional adequacy, valid estimates of nutrient intake are required. Specifically, the EURopean micronutrient RECommendations Aligned (EURRECA) Network of Excellence needs clear guidelines for assessing the validity of reported micronutrient intakes and n-3 fatty acid (FA) intakes. The aim of the present study was to review the validity of methods used to measure the usual n-3 FA intake of a population. A systematic literature search was conducted for studies validating the methodology used for measuring the dietary intake of n-3 FA. The quality of the validation studies and the quality of the different dietary assessment methods were assessed using scoring systems developed by EURRECA. Fourteen papers, describing twenty studies, were identified for inclusion. According to the score system developed by EURRECA, all the studies were ranked as average, except two that were ranked as poor. The correlation coefficients between FA in subcutaneous fat and dietary intake of n-3 FA from four FFQ, one weighed record and one 24-h recall ranged between 0.40 and 0.60. Correlations between intake of n-3 FA from five FFQ, one dietary history and three weighed records and blood lipids were similar to the ones observed for subcutaneous fat. The summarised quality of the n-3 FA estimates derived from the FFQ was judged as good or acceptable according to the EURRECA scoring system. The literature describes subcutaneous fat as the best reference method, and the studies where this was used had moderate correlation coefficients and no dietary intake method was superior to any other.
为了评估营养充足程度,需要对营养素摄入量进行有效的估计。具体而言,欧洲微量营养素推荐值协调(EURRECA)卓越网络需要明确的准则来评估报告的微量营养素摄入量和 n-3 脂肪酸(FA)摄入量的有效性。本研究的目的是综述用于评估人群 n-3 FA 通常摄入量的方法的有效性。进行了系统的文献检索,以查找验证用于测量 n-3 FA 饮食摄入量的方法的验证研究。使用 EURRECA 开发的评分系统评估了验证研究的质量和不同饮食评估方法的质量。确定了十四篇描述二十项研究的论文作为纳入标准。根据 EURRECA 开发的评分系统,所有研究的评分均为中等,只有两项评分较差。四种 FFQ、一份称重记录和一份 24 小时回顾法中 n-3 FA 与皮下脂肪 FA 之间的相关系数在 0.40 到 0.60 之间。五种 FFQ、一份饮食史和三种称重记录与血液脂质中 n-3 FA 的摄入量之间的相关性与皮下脂肪的相关性相似。根据 EURRECA 评分系统,从 FFQ 得出的 n-3 FA 估计值的综合质量被认为是良好或可接受的。文献将皮下脂肪描述为最佳参考方法,并且使用这种方法的研究具有中等的相关系数,没有一种饮食摄入方法优于其他方法。