Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Biostatistics. 2010 Apr;11(2):353-72. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp060. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
Most investigations in the social and health sciences aim to understand the directional or causal relationship between a treatment or risk factor and outcome. Given the multitude of pathways through which the treatment or risk factor may affect the outcome, there is also an interest in decomposing the effect of a treatment of risk factor into "direct" and "mediated" effects. For example, child's socioeconomic status (risk factor) may have a direct effect on the risk of death (outcome) and an effect that may be mediated through the adulthood socioeconomic status (mediator). Building on the potential outcome framework for causal inference, we develop a Bayesian approach for estimating direct and mediated effects in the context of a dichotomous mediator and dichotomous outcome, which is challenging as many parameters cannot be fully identified. We first define principal strata corresponding to the joint distribution of the observed and counterfactual values of the mediator, and define associate, dissociative, and mediated effects as functions of the differences in the mean outcome under differing treatment assignments within the principal strata. We then develop the likelihood properties and calculate nonparametric bounds of these causal effects assuming randomized treatment assignment. Because likelihood theory is not well developed for nonidentifiable parameters, we consider a Bayesian approach that allows the direct and mediated effects to be expressed in terms of the posterior distribution of the population parameters of interest. This range can be reduced by making further assumptions about the parameters that can be encoded in prior distribution assumptions. We perform sensitivity analyses by using several prior distributions that make weaker assumptions than monotonicity or the exclusion restriction. We consider an application that explores the mediating effects of adult poverty on the relationship between childhood poverty and risk of death.
大多数社会科学和健康科学的研究旨在了解治疗或风险因素与结果之间的方向或因果关系。鉴于治疗或风险因素可能通过多种途径影响结果,人们也有兴趣将治疗或风险因素的效果分解为“直接”和“中介”效果。例如,儿童的社会经济地位(风险因素)可能对死亡风险(结果)有直接影响,并且这种影响可能通过成年后的社会经济地位(中介)来介导。基于因果推理的潜在结果框架,我们开发了一种贝叶斯方法,用于估计二分类中介和二分类结果情况下的直接和中介效果,这是具有挑战性的,因为许多参数无法完全识别。我们首先定义与中介的观测值和反事实值的联合分布相对应的主要层,并将关联、分离和中介效应定义为主要层内不同治疗分配下平均结果差异的函数。然后,我们假设随机治疗分配,开发这些因果效应的似然性质并计算非参数界限。由于似然理论不适用于不可识别的参数,因此我们考虑贝叶斯方法,该方法允许直接和中介效应以感兴趣的总体参数的后验分布来表示。通过对可以用先验分布假设编码的参数做出进一步假设,可以缩小这个范围。我们通过使用比单调性或排除限制假设更弱的几种先验分布来进行敏感性分析。我们考虑了一个应用,该应用探讨了成年贫困对儿童贫困与死亡风险之间关系的中介作用。