Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 2010 Winter;22(1):177-203. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409990344.
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the theory and evidence for the links of parent-child attachment with internalizing problems in childhood and adolescence. We address three key questions: (a) how consistent is the evidence that attachment security or insecurity is linked to internalizing symptoms, anxiety, and depression? (b) How consistent is the evidence that specific forms of insecurity are more strongly related to internalizing symptoms, anxiety, and depression than are other forms of insecurity? (c) Are associations with internalizing symptoms, anxiety, and depression consistent for mother-child and father-child attachment? The current findings are consistent with the hypothesis that insecure attachment is associated with the development of internalizing problems. The links between specific insecure attachment patterns and internalizing problems are difficult to evaluate. Father-child and mother-child attachments have a comparable impact, although there are relatively few studies of father-child attachment. No moderators consistently affect these relations. We also propose two models of how attachment insecurity may combine with other factors to lead to anxiety or depression.
本文旨在评估亲子依恋与儿童和青少年内化问题之间联系的理论和证据。我们解决了三个关键问题:(a)依恋安全性或不安全性与内化症状、焦虑和抑郁之间存在一致性的证据有多少?(b)特定形式的不安全感与内化症状、焦虑和抑郁的相关性比其他形式的不安全感更强的证据有多少?(c)与内化症状、焦虑和抑郁相关的母子依恋和父子依恋是否一致?目前的研究结果与不安全依恋与内化问题发展相关的假设一致。特定不安全依恋模式与内化问题之间的联系很难评估。虽然关于父子依恋的研究相对较少,但父子依恋和母子依恋对儿童发展具有同等重要的影响。没有调节因素一致影响这些关系。我们还提出了两种模型,说明依恋不安全感如何与其他因素结合导致焦虑或抑郁。