Suppr超能文献

低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗重性抑郁障碍疗效的定量评价

Quantitative review of the efficacy of slow-frequency magnetic brain stimulation in major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2010 Nov;40(11):1789-95. doi: 10.1017/S003329171000005X. Epub 2010 Jan 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Slow-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the frontal cortex has been suggested as a safer and better tolerable alternative to fast-frequency rTMS in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of slow-frequency rTMS to the frontal cortex in MDD.

METHOD

A literature search was carried out in the databases PubMed and Web of Science in the period between January 1994 and July 2009 with the search terms 'depression' and 'transcranial magnetic stimulation'. Nine double-blind sham-controlled parallel intention-to-treat studies (252 patients) fulfilled inclusion criteria and were entered in a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The test for heterogeneity was not significant (QT=9.63, p=0.38). An overall weighted moderate mean effect size (d=0.63, 95% confidence interval=0.03-1.24) for active treatment was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that slow-frequency rTMS to the frontal cortex is more effective than sham treatment and may be equally effective as fast-frequency rTMS in the treatment of MDD.

摘要

背景

与高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)相比,刺激额叶的低频 rTMS 被认为是治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)更为安全、耐受性更好的选择。本研究旨在检验刺激额叶的低频 rTMS 治疗 MDD 的疗效。

方法

在 1994 年 1 月至 2009 年 7 月期间,我们在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库中使用“depression”和“transcranial magnetic stimulation”这两个检索词进行了文献检索。共有 9 项双盲假刺激平行对照意向治疗研究(252 例患者)符合纳入标准,被纳入随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

异质性检验无统计学意义(QT=9.63,p=0.38)。与假刺激相比,活跃治疗的总体加权平均效应量(d=0.63,95%置信区间为 0.03-1.24)适度。

结论

研究结果表明,刺激额叶的低频 rTMS 比假刺激更为有效,且在治疗 MDD 方面可能与高频 rTMS 同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验