Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.035.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether training to proficiency with the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) simulator would result in improved performance in the operating room (OR).
Nineteen junior residents underwent baseline FLS testing and were assessed in the OR using a validated global rating scale (GOALS) during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Those with GOALS scores <or=15 were randomly assigned to training (n = 9) or control (n = 8) groups. An FLS proficiency-based curriculum was used in the training group. Scoring on FLS and in the OR was repeated after the study period. Evaluators were blinded to randomization status.
Sixteen residents completed the study. There were no differences in baseline simulator (49.1 +/- 17 vs 39.5 +/- 16, P = .27) or OR scores (11.3 +/- 2.0 vs 12.0 +/- 1.8; P = .47). After training, simulator scores were higher in the trained group (95.1 +/- 4 vs 60.5 +/- 23, P = .004). OR performance improved in the control group by 1.8 to 13.8 +/- 2.2 (P = .04), whereas the trained group improved by 6.1 to 17.4 +/- 1.9 (P = .0005 vs control; P < .0001 vs baseline).
This study clearly demonstrates the educational value of FLS simulator training in surgical residency curricula.
本研究旨在评估腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)模拟器熟练度培训是否会提高手术室(OR)的手术表现。
19 名初级住院医师接受了 FLS 基线测试,并在择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间使用经过验证的全球评估量表(GOALS)在 OR 中进行了评估。GOALS 评分<or=15 的患者被随机分配到培训(n = 9)或对照组(n = 8)。培训组使用基于 FLS 熟练度的课程。研究结束后,再次对 FLS 和 OR 进行评分。评估者对随机分组状态不知情。
16 名住院医师完成了研究。基线模拟器(49.1 +/- 17 与 39.5 +/- 16,P =.27)或 OR 评分(11.3 +/- 2.0 与 12.0 +/- 1.8;P =.47)无差异。经过培训,训练组的模拟器得分更高(95.1 +/- 4 与 60.5 +/- 23,P =.004)。对照组的 OR 表现提高了 1.8 至 13.8 +/- 2.2(P =.04),而训练组提高了 6.1 至 17.4 +/- 1.9(P =.0005 与对照组相比;P<.0001 与基线相比)。
本研究清楚地表明,腹腔镜手术基础模拟器培训在外科住院医师课程中具有教育价值。