The Australian Wine Research Institute, PO Box 197, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Anal Chim Acta. 2010 Feb 15;660(1-2):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.09.049. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
Two analytical approaches for the rapid measurement of hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) have been compared to a reference method for their potential application as a rapid procedure for the quantification of H(2)S formed during alcoholic fermentations. In one case, silver nitrate, lead acetate, and mercuric chloride selective detector tubes for the analysis of H(2)S in air were investigated. In the other case, a commercially available kit for the diagnosis of nitrogen starvation in wine fermentations, which is based on the detection of H(2)S, was investigated. Both methods exhibited excellent linearity of response, but the mercuric chloride tube was found to suffer from interferences due to the concomitant presence of mercaptans, which resulted in erroneous H(2)S quantification. A comparative study between the two methods studied and the cadmium hydroxide/methylene blue reference method commonly used to monitor H(2)S indicate that the two new methods displayed better recoveries at low H(2)S concentrations, besides being more rapid and economical. The two new methods were successfully used to quantify production of H(2)S in different grape juice fermentations. The suitability of each method for the study of specific aspects of H(2)S production during fermentation is discussed.
已经比较了两种用于快速测量硫化氢 (H(2)S) 的分析方法,以评估它们作为快速定量分析酒精发酵过程中形成的 H(2)S 的潜在应用。一种方法是研究了硝酸银、乙酸铅和氯化汞选择性检测管,用于分析空气中的 H(2)S。另一种方法是研究了一种市售试剂盒,用于诊断葡萄酒发酵中的氮饥饿,该试剂盒基于 H(2)S 的检测。两种方法都表现出出色的响应线性,但氯化汞管由于同时存在巯基而受到干扰,导致 H(2)S 定量错误。对所研究的两种方法与常用的监测 H(2)S 的氢氧化镉/亚甲基蓝参考方法之间的比较研究表明,与传统方法相比,这两种新方法在低 H(2)S 浓度下具有更好的回收率,而且更快速、更经济。这两种新方法成功地用于量化不同葡萄汁发酵过程中 H(2)S 的产生。讨论了每种方法在研究发酵过程中 H(2)S 产生的特定方面的适用性。